Author
Listed:
- Vivian Akpevwe ADAMS
- Maureen Ifeanyichukwu Umeana
Abstract
While educators emphasize that the conceptual understanding of ecology is important, researchers have noted that the learning of ecology related concepts is relatively difficult. As part of the contribution to arrest the situation, this study was designed to determine the effects of Argumentation Based Science learning (ABSL) on student conceptual understanding of Ecology. The study used a quasi-experimental non- equivalent control group’s pre-test and post-test design. The study was carried out in two randomly selected co-educational secondary schools in Uvwie local government area of Delta State. The sample for the study consisted of 94 (SSI) students from two randomly selected intact classes in the sampled schools. Data for the study were collected with a Two-Tier Multiple Choice Diagnostic instrument. The instrument was subjected to face and content validity. The two intact classes of 44 and 50 students each were assigned to experimental group and control group respectively. Research questions were answered using mean and percentage. Hypotheses were tested using inferential statistics t-test and Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) at 0.05 level of significance. Findings from the study revealed that Argumentation Based Science learning enhanced student’s conceptual understanding of Ecology more than the traditional method of teaching. Recommendation and suggestion for further study were made based on the findings of the study.
Suggested Citation
Vivian Akpevwe ADAMS & Maureen Ifeanyichukwu Umeana, 2022.
"Effect of Argumentation Based Science Learning on Students Conceptual Understanding of Ecology in Senior Secondary Schools,"
International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), vol. 9(10), pages 39-46, October.
Handle:
RePEc:bjc:journl:v:9:y:2022:i:10:p:39-46
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bjc:journl:v:9:y:2022:i:10:p:39-46. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Renu Malsaria (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrsi/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.