Author
Listed:
- Adedeji S. Asher
(Chemistry Unit, Mathematics Programme, National Mathematical Centre, P. M. B. 118, Abuja, Nigeria)
- Kakulu E. Samuel
(Chemistry Department, Faculty of Applied and Natural Sciences, University of Abuja, P. M. B. 117, Abuja, Nigeria)
- Dauda S. Mary
(Chemistry Department, Faculty of Applied and Natural Sciences, University of Abuja, P. M. B. 117, Abuja, Nigeria)
Abstract
The approach of determination of precision and use of statistical analysis was applied in order to determine the suitable acid mixture for digestion of soil sample for heavy metal analysis in this work. Four different acid mixtures (HNO3 (60%v/v), HNO3:H2SO4 (2:9), HNO3/HCl (1:3), HNO3/HCl/H2SO4 (5:1:1), were compared over nine selected heavy metals (Pb, Cr, Cd, Ni, Zn, Fe, Mn, Co and Cu), and soil near a cement factory were analyzed . The precision for each of the metal in each of the acid mixture, the recovery and analysis of variance were applied to determined the most suitable acid mixture for digestion. From the results it was deduced that the t-calculated for 6 metals (Cd (0.577), Co (1.165), Mn (0.380), Cu (0.545), Ni (1.449) and Zn (1.424) (Cd, Co, Mn, Ni, Cu and Zn) were not significantly different for methods HCl:HNO3 (3:1) and HNO3:HCl:H2SO4 (5:1:1), except for Fe, Cr and Pb with significant difference. he heavy metal precision results, shows that method HNO3:HCl:H2SO4 (5:1:1) , had 7 metals with higher precisions which includes Fe and Cr, while HCl:HNO3 (3:1) had 5 metals with higher precision but does not include Fe and Cr. The statistical analysis revealed that method HNO3:HCl:H2SO4 (5:1:1) was the most efficient digestion method for the soil heavy metal analysis as it had given a significant high recovery (p
Suggested Citation
Adedeji S. Asher & Kakulu E. Samuel & Dauda S. Mary, 2020.
"Analytical Method for Comparison of Suitable Wet Digestion Methods for Heavy Metal Analysis in Soil around a Cement Industry,"
International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), vol. 7(6), pages 41-47, June.
Handle:
RePEc:bjc:journl:v:7:y:2020:i:6:p:41-47
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bjc:journl:v:7:y:2020:i:6:p:41-47. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Renu Malsaria (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrsi/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.