IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bjc/journl/v7y2020i11p84-87.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Critical Review on Comparative Study on the Analytical Results of GFRPRC Beam and CFRP RC Beam on ANSYS

Author

Listed:
  • Kuldeep Meghwal

    (M.Tech student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, College ofTechnology and Engineering, MPUAT, Udaipur, India)

  • Er. R.S. Shekhawat

    (Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, College of Technologyand Engineering, MPUAT, Udaipur, India)

Abstract

The utilization of composite materials, for example, Fiber Reinforced Polymers (FRP) in fortifying and fixing of structural components, especially those made of reinforced concrete, is generally spreading. However, for successful and practical applications, engineers must improve their insight concerning the real conduct of reinforced structures. FRP materials offers the designer an exceptional blend of physical and mechanical properties, for example, high rigidity, lightweight, improved stiffness, high fatigue strength, durability and incredible solidness. Since these frameworks are non-destructive, non-magnetic, and chemical resistant, they are an amazing alternative for outer support. The properties of FRP composites have brought about huge sparing in construction cost and decrease in shut down time of facilities when contrasted with the regular reinforcing techniques. In this study, an attempt is made to get a more clear knowledge onto which among the Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer(GFRP) and Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) is better by leading an analytical investigation on both FRPs when wrapped over Reinforced Concrete (RC) beam using ANSYS software.

Suggested Citation

  • Kuldeep Meghwal & Er. R.S. Shekhawat, 2020. "A Critical Review on Comparative Study on the Analytical Results of GFRPRC Beam and CFRP RC Beam on ANSYS," International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), vol. 7(11), pages 84-87, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bjc:journl:v:7:y:2020:i:11:p:84-87
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrsi/digital-library/volume-7-issue-11/84-87.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/virtual-library/papers/a-critical-review-on-comparative-study-on-the-analytical-results-of-gfrprc-beam-and-cfrp-rc-beam-on-ansys/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bjc:journl:v:7:y:2020:i:11:p:84-87. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Renu Malsaria (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrsi/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.