Author
Listed:
- Tessie S. Zafra.
(College of Hospitality Management, Buenavista Community College, Philippines)
- Marjely V. Torregosa.
(College of Hospitality Management, Buenavista Community College, Philippines)
- Analiza L. Chua
(College of Hospitality Management, Buenavista Community College, Philippines)
Abstract
Ginger and lemon are known for their flavor and nutritional value, thus there is promising opportunity for food product innovation. In this study, the sensory characteristics and acceptability of ginger- and lemon-flavored kropek with varying ingredients ratios. A repeated measures design was used, involving 35 students from Buenavista Community College who evaluated three treatments (T1, T2, T3) using a 5-point hedonic scale for appearance, aroma, taste, and texture. to determine the acceptability of three kropek treatments with increasing levels of ginger and lemon (T1, T2, T3) among 35 students of Buenavista Community College. A 5-point hedonic scale recorded appearance, aroma, taste, and texture. Data were analyzed by weighted mean determination and by Friedman’s test. Findings revealed that Treatment 1, with the highest amount of ginger and lemon, was most preferred across all sensory attributes but incurred the highest cost of production. Sun drying was found to extend shelf life but reduced product quality. The very marked significance differences in consumer preferences likeness across treatments highlights the impact of ingredient ratios on consumer perception. These results indicate suggest that ginger lemon flavored kropek can be a very is a promising product. Further research should focus on cost-effective production methods, improve and optimal drying techniques, as and a deeper understanding of well as on consumer preferences to optimized product development.
Suggested Citation
Tessie S. Zafra. & Marjely V. Torregosa. & Analiza L. Chua, 2025.
"Sensory Evaluation and Application of Ginger- And Lemon-Flavored Kropek: Effects on Consumer Acceptability and Shelf Life,"
International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), vol. 12(2), pages 679-692, February.
Handle:
RePEc:bjc:journl:v:12:y:2025:i:2:p:679-692
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bjc:journl:v:12:y:2025:i:2:p:679-692. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Renu Malsaria (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrsi/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.