IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bjc/journl/v11y2024i12p35-48.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prevention and Response to Sexual Exploitation and Abuse (PRSEA) in Emergencies: Beneficiary Experiences from a Cholera Outbreak Response in Kadoma City, Zimbabwe, 2024″

Author

Listed:
  • Chido Zibanayi

    (Kadoma City Health and Environmental Services Department, Zimbabwe)

  • Sarah Tengawarima

    (Kadoma City Health and Environmental Services Department, Zimbabwe)

  • Sikhanyisiwe Moyo

    (Kadoma City Health and Environmental Services Department, Zimbabwe)

  • Daniel Chirundu

    (Kadoma City Health and Environmental Services Department, Zimbabwe)

  • Clayton Munemo

    (Department of Primary Health Care Sciences: Family Medicine, Global and Public Health Unit, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe)

  • Noriah Pasi

    (World Health Organization, Harare, Zimbabwe)

  • Lincoln Sunganai Charimari

    (World Health Organization, Harare, Zimbabwe)

  • Sally-Ann Ohene

    (World Health Organization, Accra, Ghana)

Abstract

Introduction Sexual Exploitation and Abuse (SEA) is a fundamental failure to protect the vulnerable by those in power. The heightened vulnerability of individuals during public health emergencies contributes to a significant increase in reported SEA cases worldwide. PRSEA is essential to safeguarding survivors and offering support that prevents further exploitation or abuse. Kadoma City was one of the most affected areas in Zimbabwe that reported cholera cases in 2024. This study assessed the beneficiaries’ knowledge and experiences of SEA during the outbreak response. Methods We conducted a mixed methods study in Kadoma City. The study population were beneficiaries who received hygiene kits during the response from January to July 2024. A sample size 371 was calculated using Dobson’s formula. Data were collected using an interviewer-administered questionnaire, and a focus group discussion guide. Beneficiaries were selected from the cholera linelist. Analysis was done using Epi Info 7™ and thematic analysis for qualitative data. Results We interviewed 371 beneficiaries of which, 300 (81%) were females. Two hundred and ninety (78%) of them attained a secondary education (Form 1-4). Twenty-six (9%) females and 9 (13%) males had high SEA knowledge (p=0.3005). Seven (2%) respondents reported knowing a sexual relationship between a responder and a beneficiary. Three (1%) reported being sexually exploited and five (1%) reported being sexually abused during the response. Barriers to reporting SEA mentioned included fear 318 (86 %), slander 119 (32%) and perpetrator victimization 90 (24%). Respondents preferred to report SEA anonymously 247 (67%) and 158 (43 %) using toll-free lines. Conclusion Beneficiaries’ knowledge of SEA was limited. Fear was the main reporting barrier. Anonymous reporting was the preferred reporting method. We recommend integrating PRSEA mainstreaming into outbreak response activities. Addressing barriers to reporting through awareness-raising campaigns. Establishing robust accountability mechanisms for holding perpetrators accountable. Expansion of confidential reporting options.

Suggested Citation

  • Chido Zibanayi & Sarah Tengawarima & Sikhanyisiwe Moyo & Daniel Chirundu & Clayton Munemo & Noriah Pasi & Lincoln Sunganai Charimari & Sally-Ann Ohene, 2024. "Prevention and Response to Sexual Exploitation and Abuse (PRSEA) in Emergencies: Beneficiary Experiences from a Cholera Outbreak Response in Kadoma City, Zimbabwe, 2024″," International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), vol. 11(12), pages 35-48, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bjc:journl:v:11:y:2024:i:12:p:35-48
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrsi/digital-library/volume-11-issue-12/35-48.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrsi/articles/prevention-and-response-to-sexual-exploitation-and-abuse-prsea-in-emergencies-beneficiary-experiences-from-a-cholera-outbreak-response-in-kadoma-city-zimbabwe-2024/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bjc:journl:v:11:y:2024:i:12:p:35-48. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Renu Malsaria (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrsi/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.