Author
Listed:
- Tsholofelo Ethan Mootseng
(Department of Mother & Child Health, School of Medicine, University of Namibia)
- Sheehama Jacob
(Human, Biological and Translational Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Namibia TESA UNAM, Trials of Excellence in Southern Africa, Namibia)
- Pinehas Lucia
(Department of Nursing Sciences, School of Nursing and Public Health, University of Namibia)
Abstract
Introduction: There has been a global rise in caesarian sections that translates into a rise in maternal and foetal morbidity that is associated with caesarian section. A tool needs to be in place to monitor the caesarian sections and deal with this rise. The WHO recommended the use of the Robson Ten Group Classification this tool. Methodology: Women who delivered via caesarian section between 01 May 2024 and 31 July 2024 were classified according to the Robson Ten Groups Classification. Those who’s files were missing were not classified and hence excluded from the analysis. Indications in each group as well as the overall indications were noted and the caesarian section rate during the study period was also determined. Results: The overall caesarean section rate during the study period was 36.6%. Group 5, 10 and 1 contributed 30.5% [242/794], 17.6% [140/794] and16.4% [130/794], respectively these were the highest groups contributing 64.6% of the total c-sections. The most common indication for c-section was a pathological cardiotocography (foetal distress) Conclusions: Attempts should be made to avoid the first c/section as group 5 being high is shows that women receiving a c-section are at a higher risk for a subsequent one. Intrapartum foetal monitoring practices should be revised to prevent or reduce the rise in c-sections due to a pathological CTG.
Suggested Citation
Tsholofelo Ethan Mootseng & Sheehama Jacob & Pinehas Lucia, 2024.
"Caesarian Section Rates at Windhoek Referal Hospitals, Namibia by Robson Classification: A 3 Month Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study,"
International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), vol. 11(11), pages 892-900, November.
Handle:
RePEc:bjc:journl:v:11:y:2024:i:11:p:892-900
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bjc:journl:v:11:y:2024:i:11:p:892-900. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Renu Malsaria (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrsi/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.