Author
Listed:
- Papa Dasari
(Former Senior Professor, Dept of OBGY, JIPMER, Puducherry Currently, Professor, Dept. Of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Dean Research, SVMCHRC. Puducherry, INDIA.)
- Mahalashmi Thulasilingam
(Additional Professor, Dept. of Preventive and Social Medicine, JIPMER, Puducherry, 605006, India.)
- Jayagowri Shasthry
(Senior Research Fellow Global Health, Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Australia)
- Jane Fischer
(Finkel Professor of Global Health, Head, Division of Social Sciences, Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Australia.)
Abstract
Background: Continuous maternal support during labour and childbirth is one of the evidence based interventions that proved to be associated with good maternal and perinatal outcomes. It is also reported to increase maternal satisfaction and decrease the disrespect and abuse. But few studies report the occurrence of D&A even in presence of birth companion. Objective: To determine the proportion of women treated with Disrespect and Abuse and to identify the type of disrespect and abuse as perceived by the birth companions of women who gave birth at Women and Children Hospital. Methods: Prospective observational mixed method pilot study undertaken from September 2020-December 2020 as a part of the Project on Respectful Maternity Care. Thirty birth companions were recruited randomly after informed consent to participate soon after (72hrs) delivery of their ward (postpartum women). They were asked to fill the answers to USAID-MCHIP Questionnaire on RMC, Rate the Disrespect and abuse on a 10 point scale to measure D&A quantitatively. They were interviewed to tell their views on the care given during labour and postpartum period for qualitative analysis. Results: As per their observations, 43.3% opined that the women experienced at least one type of D&A, 13.3% opined women experience 2 types of D&A, 10% percent witnessed 3 types of D&A; 3.3% felt 5 types of D&A as per the USAID Standards. On rating scale they felt that D&A was experienced by only 20% and 3.3% experienced severe D&A. The most common type of D&A was non-dignified care followed by physical abuse. Qualitative analysis revealed 93% felt the women received quality care and had positive experience and appreciated RMC as good and 6.7% gave suggestions to improve RMC. Conclusion: RMC as witnessed by birth companions and assessed quantitatively by Questionnaire was high but on rating scale it is low. Only few felt, women in labour still experience D&A in their presence and the most common type was non-dignified care. The overall experience of childbirth care was perceived as good and they were grateful to have allowed them to give maternal support
Suggested Citation
Papa Dasari & Mahalashmi Thulasilingam & Jayagowri Shasthry & Jane Fischer, 2024.
"Respectful Maternity Care as perceived by the Birth Companions of Women who gave birth in a Tertiary care Teaching Hospital in South India: A pilot study,"
International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), vol. 11(11), pages 746-757, November.
Handle:
RePEc:bjc:journl:v:11:y:2024:i:11:p:746-757
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bjc:journl:v:11:y:2024:i:11:p:746-757. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Renu Malsaria (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrsi/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.