IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bit/bsrysr/v13y2022i2p117-134n5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Which Digital Tools dominate Secondary and Higher Education in Economics: Google, Microsoft or Zoom?

Author

Listed:
  • Pavić Ivana

    (The University of Zagreb, Faculty of Economics and Business, Croatia)

  • Mijušković Veljko M.

    (The University of Belgrade, Faculty of Economics and Business, Serbia)

  • Žager Lajoš

    (The University of Zagreb, Faculty of Economics and Business, Croatia)

Abstract

Background: Due to the Covid 19 pandemic, in many countries, higher, secondary and even primary education experienced the unannounced shift from traditional classroom lessons to distance teaching using different technologies. Objectives: The main objective of the research was to identify the most important digital tools applied by educators and students during the pandemic and evaluate their satisfaction with applying these tools in four countries; Croatia, Germany, Poland and Serbia. Methods/Approach: The questionnaires were sent via emails to educators and distributed through the classes to students using digital teaching platforms or emails. The answers were analysed by descriptive statistics. Results: Research showed that Google tools most commonly used by students and educators are; YouTube, Gmail, Google Translate, Google Maps and Google Drive. Microsoft digital tools most commonly used by educators and students in observed countries are; Word, PowerPoint and Excel. Other digital tools most commonly used by educators are Zoom and Moodle, while students mostly use Zoom and Kahoot. Moreover, this paper identifies the main reasons for educators’ insufficient use of digital tools. Conclusions: Google, Microsoft and Zoom dominate their specific domains: Google for networks, Microsoft for documents, and Zoom for online meetings.

Suggested Citation

  • Pavić Ivana & Mijušković Veljko M. & Žager Lajoš, 2022. "Which Digital Tools dominate Secondary and Higher Education in Economics: Google, Microsoft or Zoom?," Business Systems Research, Sciendo, vol. 13(2), pages 117-134, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bit:bsrysr:v:13:y:2022:i:2:p:117-134:n:5
    DOI: 10.2478/bsrj-2022-0018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/bsrj-2022-0018
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/bsrj-2022-0018?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    digital tools; Google; Microsoft; Zoom; education; learning; students;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I20 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - General
    • I21 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Analysis of Education
    • M20 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Economics - - - General
    • M21 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Economics - - - Business Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bit:bsrysr:v:13:y:2022:i:2:p:117-134:n:5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.