IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bic/journl/v25y2025i1p72-87.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The public-private sector wage gap in Lithuania: evidence from social security data

Author

Listed:
  • Jose Garcia-Louzao

    (Lietuvos Bankas, Vilnius, Lithuania;b Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • Karolina Jonuškaitė

    (University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands)

Abstract

This paper estimates high-dimensional fixed effects models using detailed administrative data to characterize the public-private wage gap in Lithuania between 2010 and 2020. We quantify that public sector employees earn, on average, 10% more than their private sector counterparts. A decomposition exercise reveals that public sector employers pay only 0.3% less to all their employees, suggesting that the existing premium is not due to organization-specific wage policies. We also document that women benefit from working in the public sector, as they have a 16% premium due to both being employed in organizations with higher premiums and having higher returns to individual-specific components compared to women in private firms. In contrast, men have higher returns to unobserved permanent heterogeneity, which are particularly high for public sector workers, but they are with employers that have lower premiums relative to men in the private sector, resulting in an observed public sector premium of 4%. Our results highlight the importance of using mobility across firms, not just across sectors, and of isolating firm-specific wage components from other sources of wage variation to properly understand the sources of pay differentials across employers with different wage-setting protocols.

Suggested Citation

  • Jose Garcia-Louzao & Karolina Jonuškaitė, 2025. "The public-private sector wage gap in Lithuania: evidence from social security data," Baltic Journal of Economics, Baltic International Centre for Economic Policy Studies, vol. 25(1), pages 72-87.
  • Handle: RePEc:bic:journl:v:25:y:2025:i:1:p:72-87
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/epdf/10.1080/1406099X.2025.2475593
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bic:journl:v:25:y:2025:i:1:p:72-87. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Anna Zasova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/biceplv.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.