IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bhx/ojtjts/v5y2023i2p1-14id1512.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantifying Success: Measuring ROI in Test Automation

Author

Listed:
  • Rohit Khankhoje

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper to provide strategic decision to implement test automation with measurable ROI is a favoured approach for organizations seeking to improve the quality of their software, expedite delivery, and mitigate testing expenses. Methodology: The present paper, titled "Quantifying Success: Measuring ROI in Test Automation," delves deeply into the fundamental aspects of ROI evaluation within the realm of test automation. It outlines the methodology behind ROI calculation, explores the cost factors and advantages associated with automation, and sheds light on the optimal strategies for achieving a favourable ROI. Findings: By presenting real-world case studies and examples, this paper effectively demonstrates the practical application of ROI measurement in test automation. The formula for Return on Investment (ROI) typically falls under the category of being "basic". While costs are relatively simple to measure, assessing the worth of potential advantages proves to be considerably more challenging. Unique Contribution to Theory, Policy, and Practice: Approaches to calculating ROI often oversimplify various aspects of test automation, subsequently resulting in inaccurate outcomes. These inaccuracies, in turn, foster impractical expectations among management in relation to test automation, ultimately culminating in failure at individual, team, and occasionally project levels, thereby offering valuable insights to organizations seeking to optimize the efficacy of their testing endeavours.

Suggested Citation

  • Rohit Khankhoje, 2023. "Quantifying Success: Measuring ROI in Test Automation," Journal of Technology and Systems, CARI Journals Limited, vol. 5(2), pages 1-14.
  • Handle: RePEc:bhx:ojtjts:v:5:y:2023:i:2:p:1-14:id:1512
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://carijournals.org/journals/index.php/JTS/article/view/1512/1867
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bhx:ojtjts:v:5:y:2023:i:2:p:1-14:id:1512. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chief Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.carijournals.org/journals/index.php/JTS/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.