Author
Listed:
- Priscilla Simasiku
- Prof. Efigenia Madalena Mario Semente
Abstract
Purpose: The Namibian banking industry faces serious competition, making competitive strategy design a critical agenda. The banks must adjust their banking models, and strategies and align them to technological advancements in the industry. This study explores the impact of technology on the banking industry using Porter’s Five Forces model. The five forces are customers' bargaining power, suppliers' availability of substitute products, rivalry in the industry, and new entrants in the industry. The study examined how advancing technologies influence competition and employee performance, particularly when the model is applied effectively. Methodology: Using a quantitative, descriptive explanatory approach, data was collected via a 5-point Likert scale questionnaire from 269 randomly selected respondents, spanning various hierarchical levels. The data was analysed using SPSS and the results were presented in the form of frequencies percentages and tables and figures. Findings: The study found that banks in Namibia have a stronger link between technology and the bargaining power of customers and a weaker relationship between technology and the bargaining power of suppliers. The study further found a likely awareness of technological usage by the bank's staff resulting in a demand for upskilling in digital banking solutions. Unique contribution to theory, practice and policy: The study concluded that while Porter's Five Forces model remains relevant, its application must adapt to technological advancements to sustain competitive performance. Recommendations include training programs, strategic refinements, and proactive measures to mitigate competitive threats.
Suggested Citation
Priscilla Simasiku & Prof. Efigenia Madalena Mario Semente, 2025.
"An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Namibian Banks’ Competitive Strategies in Response to Technological Advancements: A Case Study,"
Journal of Business and Strategic Management, CARI Journals Limited, vol. 10(3), pages 27-55.
Handle:
RePEc:bhx:ojjbsm:v:10:y:2025:i:3:p:27-55:id:2646
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bhx:ojjbsm:v:10:y:2025:i:3:p:27-55:id:2646. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chief Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.carijournals.org/journals/index.php/JBSM/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.