IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bhx/ojijce/v4y2023i1p33-41id1291.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparative Study of RSA and ELGAMAL Cryptosystems

Author

Listed:
  • Paul K. Arhin Jnr
  • Prof. Michael Asante
  • Linda Otoo

Abstract

Purpose: In this research, a comparative analysis of the RSA and ELGAMAL algorithms is presented using their encryption and decryption speed with different key sizes. ElGamal and RSA are two popular public-key cryptographic algorithms that depend on the mathematical difficulty of computing discrete logarithms in finite fields and factoring large integers, respectively. Methodology: In this study, the speed at which messages of various sizes can be encrypted and decrypted using various key sizes is used to gauge how well these algorithms work. Findings: RSA usually outperforms ElGamal in terms of encryption and decryption speed, according to the results. However, as the key sizes grow, the performance gap between the two algorithms narrows. Unique Contribution to Theory, Policy and Practice: These findings can aid in selecting the appropriate algorithm and key size for different applications that require secure communication and data encryption.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul K. Arhin Jnr & Prof. Michael Asante & Linda Otoo, 2023. "A Comparative Study of RSA and ELGAMAL Cryptosystems," International Journal of Computing and Engineering, CARI Journals Limited, vol. 4(1), pages 33-41.
  • Handle: RePEc:bhx:ojijce:v:4:y:2023:i:1:p:33-41:id:1291
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://carijournals.org/journals/index.php/IJCE/article/view/1291/1490
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bhx:ojijce:v:4:y:2023:i:1:p:33-41:id:1291. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chief Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.carijournals.org/journals/index.php/IJCE/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.