IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bfy/ojijbs/v11y2025i1p14-35id2620.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Role of Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) in Enhancing Oil Sector Development in South Sudan

Author

Listed:
  • Kadugala Aniceto

Abstract

Purpose: This paper assessed the impact of Public-Private Partnerships (PPP) in capacity enhancement within the oil industry in South Sudan, targeting on themes such as local jobs, capacity enhancement, drilling equipment, digital reservoir management, pipeline, regulatory, revenue, and community interactions. Materials and Methods: The study applied descriptive research, collecting and analyzing data from existing documents, which is a document review strategy where the empirical results of previous studies and reports are integrated. This type of design is well suited for investigation into the pre-existing documents, reports, and literature and providing detailed information relating to the research. With this method, researchers are able to gain a more detailed perspective regarding relationships, patterns and trends that can be found in already available data such that it is most suited for investigations that have to do with secondary sources and analytics of already available data Findings: The study indicates that PPPs are valuable in increasing refinery capacities and establishing associated transportation systems. Through the use of international funding, these initiatives make it possible for internationally owned companies to invest in infrastructure projects. From the analysis, construction-related efforts involving local employment can result in a more sophisticated skilled base, this coupled with capacity building programs guarantees work for South Sudanese people in the long run. In addition, the implementation of complex drilling techniques, like horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing has significantly increased oil recovery rates. Furthermore, the combination of AI technologies with reservoir management digital tools, such as predictive analytics with 3D/4D seismic technologies boosts monitoring activities and effectiveness. Implications to Theory, Practice and Policy: The research notes the need for the optimization of existing pipeline network operations accompanied with real time monitoring systems and logics for efficient leak detection. It is also crucial to enhance the legal frameworks through inter-agency coordination and the use of international benchmarks to develop a disclosure-friendly and accountable oil industry. Besides, communities are educated about management of resources by ensuring accountability through the establishment of open data portals and routine auditing which provides reporting opportunities for revenue. Factors such as community consultations during the project planning, and grievance handling mechanisms to foster trust amongst stakeholders are necessary. The oil sector in South Sudan benefited from PPPs and the sector will develop if all government agencies, private investors and communities work together for a long term outcome measures. Keywords: Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) → H54 (National Government Expenditures and Related Policies: Infrastructures; Other Public Investment and Capital Stock), Oil Sector → Q40 (Energy: General) / Q35 (Hydrocarbon Resources), Technological Advancement → O33 (Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes), Operational Efficiency → L95 (Gas Utilities; Pipelines; Water Utilities) / D24 (Production; Cost; Capital; Total Factor Productivity; Capacity), Governance → H83 (Public Administration; Public Sector Accounting and Audits). Transparency → D73 (Bureaucracy; Administrative Processes in Public Organizations; Corruption), Environmental Sustainability → Q58 (Environmental Policy, Regulation, and Law)

Suggested Citation

  • Kadugala Aniceto, 2025. "Role of Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) in Enhancing Oil Sector Development in South Sudan," International Journal of Business Strategies, AJPO, vol. 11(1), pages 14-35.
  • Handle: RePEc:bfy:ojijbs:v:11:y:2025:i:1:p:14-35:id:2620
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ajpojournals.org/journals/index.php/IJBS/article/view/2620/3491
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    (PPPs) → H54 (National Government Expenditures and Related Policies: Infrastructures; Other Public Investment and Capital Stock); Oil Sector → Q40 (Energy: General) / Q35 (Hydrocarbon Resources); Technological Advancement → O33 (Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes); Operational Efficiency → L95 (Gas Utilities; Pipelines; Water Utilities) / D24 (Production; Cost; Capital; Total Factor Productivity; Capacity); Governance → H83 (Public Administration; Public Sector Accounting and Audits). Transparency → D73 (Bureaucracy; Administrative Processes in Public Organizations; Corruption); Environmental Sustainability → Q58 (Environmental Policy; Regulation; and Law);
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H54 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Infrastructures
    • Q40 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - General
    • Q35 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Nonrenewable Resources and Conservation - - - Hydrocarbon Resources
    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes
    • L95 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities - - - Gas Utilities; Pipelines; Water Utilities
    • D24 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Production; Cost; Capital; Capital, Total Factor, and Multifactor Productivity; Capacity
    • H83 - Public Economics - - Miscellaneous Issues - - - Public Administration
    • D73 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Bureaucracy; Administrative Processes in Public Organizations; Corruption
    • Q58 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bfy:ojijbs:v:11:y:2025:i:1:p:14-35:id:2620. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chief Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ajpojournals.org/journals/index.php/IJBS/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.