Intersectionality and Mental Health Outcomes among LGBTQ+ Refugees in United States

Purpose: The aim of the study was to assess the intersectionality and mental health outcomes among LGBTQ+ refugees in United States. Methodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries. Findings: The study revealed complex interactions between various aspects of identity and experiences of persecution or discrimination. LGBTQ+ refugees often face multiple layers of marginalization due to their sexual orientation or gender identity, as well as other intersecting factors such as race, ethnicity, religion, and socioeconomic status. These intersecting forms of discrimination can significantly impact mental health outcomes, leading to higher rates of depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and other psychological distress among LGBTQ+ refugees compared to the general population. Implications to Theory, Practice and Policy: Intersectionality theory, minority stress theory and acculturation stress theory may be used to anchor future studies on assessing the intersectionality and mental health outcomes among LGBTQ+ refugees in United States. Culturally competent mental health services tailored to the specific needs of LGBTQ+ refugees should be developed and implemented. Policy initiatives should address structural barriers and systemic inequalities that contribute to mental health disparities among LGBTQ+ refugees.