Author
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of the study was to assess the influence of human rights advocacy on foreign aid allocation, a study of EU policies toward Sub-Saharan Africa. Methodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries. Findings: The study indicated that the European Union increasingly prioritizes countries with better human rights records when deciding on aid allocation. This approach aligns with the EU's commitment to promoting democratic values and human rights globally. The study highlights that nations demonstrating progress in human rights improvements are more likely to receive increased aid, suggesting a strategic use of foreign aid as a tool for encouraging positive changes in governance and human rights practices. Additionally, the study underscores the importance of advocacy efforts by non-governmental organizations and civil society in shaping policy decisions, as these groups often bring attention to human rights issues that influence the EU's aid strategies. Overall, the study underscores the EU's dual focus on humanitarian goals and strategic geopolitical interests in its foreign aid policies. Implications to Theory, Practice and Policy: Normative power Europe theory, dependency theory and principal-agent theory may be used to anchor future studies on assessing the influence of human rights advocacy on foreign aid allocation, a study of EU policies toward Sub-Saharan Africa. To enhance the practical effectiveness of EU aid policies in promoting human rights in Sub-Saharan Africa, it is crucial to strengthen monitoring and evaluation mechanisms. Tailoring aid strategies to local contexts within Sub-Saharan Africa is essential for maximizing the impact of EU policies on human rights outcomes.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bfy:ojajir:v:9:y:2024:i:3:p:1-11:id:2267. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chief Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ajpojournals.org/journals/index.php/AJIR/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.