Author
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of the study was to assess the impact of economic sanctions on bilateral trade relations, a comparative study of US sanctions on Iran and North Korea. Methodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries. Findings: The study revealed significant disruptions in trade dynamics between the United States and the targeted nations. The sanctions often lead to a substantial decrease in bilateral trade volumes, with affected countries experiencing reduced exports to and imports from the U.S. This decline is primarily due to the increased costs and risks associated with trading under sanctions, which deter businesses from engaging in commercial activities. Furthermore, the study highlights that the effectiveness and impact of sanctions vary depending on the economic resilience and trade diversification of the targeted country. Nations with diversified trade portfolios and stronger economic ties with non-U.S. partners are better able to mitigate the adverse effects of sanctions. Conversely, countries heavily reliant on U.S. trade face more pronounced economic hardships. The study underscores the strategic use of sanctions as a tool of foreign policy, illustrating both their intended and unintended economic consequences on global trade relations. Implications to Theory, Practice and Policy: Deterrence theory, economic statecraft theory and interdependence theory may be used to anchor future studies on assessing the impact of economic sanctions on bilateral trade relations, a comparative study of US sanctions on Iran and North Korea. In practice, policymakers should adopt a more targeted approach in designing economic sanctions. Policymakers should prioritize international collaboration and coordination to ensure that sanctions achieve their intended political objectives without exacerbating humanitarian crises.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bfy:ojajir:v:9:y:2024:i:2:p:40-51:id:2266. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chief Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ajpojournals.org/journals/index.php/AJIR/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.