Author
Listed:
- Walter Jabali Jilani
- Prof. Annie Hilda Ong’ayo
- Dr. Andrew W. Wamukota
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate access to different farm input and Climate-Smart Agriculture technology adoption across various agricultural value chains. Materials and Methods: Key informant interviews, focus group discussions, and a semi-structured questionnaire were used to collect the data from 304 participants who included Lead farmers, extension officers and Smallholders farmers. The data collection exercise was carried from august to October 2022. Analysis was done using R software (v4.4.1). Findings: High adoption rates of improved breeds across value chains: cotton (96.4%), dairy (88.4%), cashew (74.3%), and poultry (64.6%). Direct purchase was the main predominant input acquisition method, particularly among cotton (82.1%) and cashew farmers (74.3%). Alternative acquisition strategies included borrowing from peers (notably cashew at 31.4% and dairy at 28.3%), input hiring (highest in cotton at 14%), and modification of existing inputs (highest in poultry at 29.4%). Welch T-test results (t=0.632, p>0.05) indicated no significant difference between individual and group-based input acquisition approaches. Organizing farmers into value chains or producer communities did not significantly enhance input access or utilization, and therefore, had minimal impact on improving Climate-Smart Agriculture adoption outcomes. Unique contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Integrate innovative targeted input subsidy programs that bundle complementary inputs (seeds, fertilizers, pesticides) into complete and accessible packages to promote holistic adoption. Implementing mobile-based inventory tracking for rural agro-dealers can prevent stockouts and provide farmers with real-time input availability via SMS alerts.
Suggested Citation
Walter Jabali Jilani & Prof. Annie Hilda Ong’ayo & Dr. Andrew W. Wamukota, 2025.
"Enhancing Climate-Smart Agriculture: The Role of Farm Input Accessibility in Selected Smallholder Enterprises in Lamu County, Kenya,"
American Journal of Environment Studies, AJPO Journals Limited, vol. 8(1), pages 1-20.
Handle:
RePEc:bfy:ojajes:v:8:y:2025:i:1:p:1-20:id:2665
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bfy:ojajes:v:8:y:2025:i:1:p:1-20:id:2665. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chief Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ajpojournals.org/journals/index.php/AJES/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.