Author
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of the study was to assess the relationship between environmental education programs and pro-environmental behaviors among youth in Kenya. Methodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries. Findings: Environmental education programs have shown a significant positive correlation with the adoption of pro-environmental behaviors among youth. Studies indicate that exposure to such programs enhances environmental knowledge, attitudes, and values, which, in turn, translate into tangible behavioral changes. These programs often incorporate experiential learning, outdoor activities, and community engagement, fostering a deeper connection with nature and a sense of responsibility towards environmental stewardship. Furthermore, longitudinal studies suggest that the effects of environmental education programs are not only immediate but can also have a lasting impact, leading to sustained pro-environmental behaviors into adulthood. However, the effectiveness of these programs may vary depending on factors such as program design, delivery methods, and the socio-cultural context in which they are implemented. Implications to Theory, Practice and Policy: Theory of planned behavior, social learning theory and ecological systems theory may be used to anchor future studies on assessing the relationship between environmental education programs and pro-environmental behaviors among youth in Kenya. Environmental education programs should diversify their designs to cater to different learning preferences and demographics among youth. Policymakers should consider integrating environmental education into formal school curricula to ensure consistent exposure and impact.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bfy:ojajes:v:7:y:2024:i:1:p:43-56:id:1920. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chief Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ajpojournals.org/journals/index.php/AJES/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.