Author
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of the study was to assess the influence of religious beliefs on moral decision-making in Russia. Methodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries. Findings: The study indicated that religious beliefs can significantly impact individuals' moral decision-making processes. For instance, studies suggest that individuals who adhere to religious doctrines often use them as a guiding framework for determining right and wrong, leading to the incorporation of religious values into their moral judgments. Furthermore, religious teachings and scriptures often emphasize ethical principles and virtues, which can shape individuals' moral reasoning and behavior. However, the relationship between religious beliefs and moral decision-making is not universally consistent, as factors such as the interpretation of religious teachings, personal convictions, and situational influences also play significant roles. Additionally, study suggests that individuals with religious affiliations may exhibit differences in moral reasoning compared to those without such affiliations, although the extent of these differences varies across different contexts and cultures. Implications to Theory, Practice and Policy: Social identity theory, cognitive dissonance theory and moral foundations theory may be used to anchor future studies on assessing the influence of religious beliefs on moral decision-making in Russia. Educators, community leaders, and policymakers should prioritize initiatives aimed at promoting religious literacy and fostering interfaith dialogue among diverse populations in European societies. Policymakers should uphold principles of religious freedom and pluralism, enshrined in international human rights frameworks and national legislation, to protect the rights of individuals to practice their religious beliefs without discrimination or coercion.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bfy:oejpcr:v:8:y:2024:i:1:p:36-46:id:1966. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chief Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ajpojournals.org/journals/index.php/EJPCR/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.