Comparative Study of Traditional vs. Modern Approaches in Treating Diabetes in Rwanda

Purpose: The aim of the study was to assess the comparative study of traditional vs. modern approaches in treating diabetes in Rwanda. Methodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries. Findings: Traditional approaches, often rooted in cultural practices and natural remedies, emphasize holistic treatment and the use of herbs, dietary modifications, and lifestyle changes. These methods, prevalent in regions such as Asia and Africa, focus on improving overall health and managing diabetes symptoms through natural means. For instance, herbal treatments like bitter melon, fenugreek, and cinnamon have shown potential in regulating blood sugar levels and enhancing insulin sensitivity. On the other hand, modern approaches to diabetes treatment primarily rely on advanced medical technologies and pharmaceutical interventions. These include the use of insulin therapy, oral hypoglycemic agents, and continuous glucose monitoring systems. Modern medicine provides precise and immediate control over blood sugar levels, which is crucial for preventing complications associated with diabetes, such as cardiovascular diseases, neuropathy, and retinopathy. Additionally, modern treatments are supported by extensive clinical research and evidence-based practices, ensuring their efficacy and safety. The study also indicates that a hybrid approach, integrating both traditional and modern methods, can offer a comprehensive strategy for managing diabetes. This integration allows patients to benefit from the quick and precise control of modern medicine while also leveraging the long-term health benefits of traditional practices. Implications to Theory, Practice and Policy: Health belief model (HBM), technology acceptance model and social cognitive theory may be used to anchor future studies on assessing the comparative study of traditional vs. modern approaches in treating diabetes in Rwanda. Incorporating findings from the comparative study into practice can lead to personalized medicine approaches in diabetes management. The research findings should inform evidence-based guidelines for diabetes management at institutional and national levels. These guidelines should consider the comparative efficacy, safety profiles, cost-effectiveness, and patient preferences of traditional and modern approaches.