IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ben/ttebsp/v3y2016i2p131-141.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analyzing the FDA Priority Review Voucher Program’s Stimulation of Research and Public Health Impact

Author

Listed:
  • Chris Bialas
  • Elizabeth Higbee-Dempsey
  • Cindy Y. Chen
  • Caitlin Ward
  • Oscar A Marcos-Contreras
  • Dan Mulreany
  • Allen B. Reitz
  • Dennis M. Gross

    (Pennsylvania Drug Discovery Institute, Pennsylvania Biotechnology Center, 3805 Old Easton Rd., Doylestown, PA 18902, USA)

Abstract

Priority Review Vouchers are FDA incentive programs for stimulating research into rare pediatric and neglected tropical diseases. Upon successful approval of a new drug application or new biologic license application for a target rare/neglected disease, the sponsor is awarded a voucher. This voucher may then be applied to shorten the review time of any subsequent drug/biologic application. The voucher can also be sold for use by another drug sponsor. These programs have been controversial and subject to criticism. In order to supplement current reviews of the programs, we have undertaken a quantitative analysis of the programs’ efficacy. Through interviews and examination of available data, we have observed an increase in drug approval, significant interest in the intended research areas as well as some modest investment since program establishment. Despite the increase in the use of these vouchers, there is no evidence of a decrease in the FDA’s ability to respond to drug applications in a timely manner. Taken together, we conclude that the programs appear to be on track to stimulate research and development for the targeted rare/neglected indications. Because of the long cycle of drug development, more time is needed before a conclusion can be made on whether the programs have met their stated goals. Finally, we offer suggestions for improvement to the program.

Suggested Citation

  • Chris Bialas & Elizabeth Higbee-Dempsey & Cindy Y. Chen & Caitlin Ward & Oscar A Marcos-Contreras & Dan Mulreany & Allen B. Reitz & Dennis M. Gross, 2016. "Analyzing the FDA Priority Review Voucher Program’s Stimulation of Research and Public Health Impact," Technology Transfer and Entrepreneurship, Bentham Science Publishers, vol. 3(2), pages 131-141, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:ben:ttebsp:v:3:y:2016:i:2:p:131-141
    DOI: 10.2174/2213809903666160720100857
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.eurekaselect.com/144084/article
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2174/2213809903666160720100857?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ben:ttebsp:v:3:y:2016:i:2:p:131-141. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Rehana Raza (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.