Author
Listed:
- Rodrigo Ferrari
- Gabriela Kothe
- Eduardo Lusa Cadore
- Luiz Fernando Martins Kruel
(Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil)
- Martim Bottaro
(University of BrasÃlia, BrasÃlia.DF, Brazil)
Abstract
Background : Data investigating the factors that influence the relationship between different percentages of one repetition maximum (1RM) and the maximum number of repetitions (RM’s) performed are scarce when the movement velocity of each repetition is controlled during the RM’s test. Objective : To evaluate the RM’s performed at 60, 75, and 90% of 1RM in 4 different upper-body free weight exercises: bench press, barbell triceps extension, unilateral dumbbell elbow flexion, unilateral bent knee dumbbell row. Method : Thirty participants, 15 trained (T) and 15 untrained (UT) men, volunteered to participate in this study and attended six separate occasions, each separated by at least 48 h. In the first three sessions, familiarization and 1RM tests were evaluated. The last three sessions were designed to assess the performance of the RM’s at 60%, 75%, and 90% 1RM. The exercise order and intensities performed in each session were randomized. Muscle action velocity for each repetition was controlled by an electronic metronome. Results : There was no significant difference between T and UT in any of the exercises at a given exercise intensity. Moreover, there was no significant difference in the number of repetitions performed when exercises with different muscle mass (i.e., bench press vs. triceps extension, and dumbbell row vs. elbow flexion) at different intensities (i.e., 60%, 75%, and 90%) were compared. Conclusion : Using the same percentage of 1RM, the participants performed a similar number of repetitions in the four free weight upper-body exercises evaluated.
Suggested Citation
Rodrigo Ferrari & Gabriela Kothe & Eduardo Lusa Cadore & Luiz Fernando Martins Kruel & Martim Bottaro, 2017.
"Muscle Mass and Training Status Do Not Affect the Maximum Number of Repetitions in Different Upper-Body Resistance Exercises,"
The Open Sports Sciences Journal, Bentham Open, vol. 10(1), pages 81-86, April.
Handle:
RePEc:ben:tospsj:v:10:y:2017:i:1:p:81-86
DOI: 10.2174/1875399X01710010081
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ben:tospsj:v:10:y:2017:i:1:p:81-86. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Rehana Raza (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.