IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bec/imsber/v8y2016i2p67-79.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pragmatism for Mixed Method Research at Higher Education Level

Author

Listed:
  • Gohar Saleem Parvaiz

    (Institute of Management Sciences, Peshawar)

  • Owais Mufti

    (Institute of Management Sciences, Peshawar)

  • Muhammad Wahab

    (Institute of Management Sciences, Peshawar)

Abstract

Justifying mixed method approach through a philosophical paradigm is always a tough call, even for experienced researchers. In this regard, this research aims to justify the use of ‘Pragmatism’ supporting mixed method approach with the help of Laughlin (1995) matrix or methodological framework. For investigation, this research has used articulation approach; grounding essential theoretical information around pragmatism within Laughlin methodological framework to justify its use as a valid academic approach to mixed method research

Suggested Citation

  • Gohar Saleem Parvaiz & Owais Mufti & Muhammad Wahab, 2016. "Pragmatism for Mixed Method Research at Higher Education Level," Business & Economic Review, Institute of Management Sciences, Peshawar, Pakistan, vol. 8(2), pages 67-79, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:bec:imsber:v:8:y:2016:i:2:p:67-79
    DOI: dx.doi.org/10.22547/BER/8.2.5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://imsciences.edu.pk/files/journals/volume%208_No2_October2016/5%20-Pragmatism%20for%20Mixed%20Method%20Research.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/dx.doi.org/10.22547/BER/8.2.5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrew C. Wicks & R. Edward Freeman, 1998. "Organization Studies and the New Pragmatism: Positivism, Anti-positivism, and the Search for Ethics," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 9(2), pages 123-140, April.
    2. Lex Donaldson, 1992. "The Weick Stuff: Managing Beyond Games," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 3(4), pages 461-466, November.
    3. Thomas C. Powell, 2001. "Competitive advantage: logical and philosophical considerations," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(9), pages 875-888, September.
    4. Joanne Martin, 1990. "Deconstructing Organizational Taboos: The Suppression of Gender Conflict in Organizations," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 1(4), pages 339-359, November.
    5. Fishman, Daniel B., 1991. "An introduction to the experimental versus the pragmatic paradigm in evaluation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 14(4), pages 353-363, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gohar Saleem Parvaiz & Owais Mufti & Saleem Gul, 2017. "Problems and Challenges in Skills Development: A Perspective from Professional Accounting Education," Business & Economic Review, Institute of Management Sciences, Peshawar, Pakistan, vol. 9(4), pages 83-110, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Prabhir Poruthiyil, 2013. "Weaning Business Ethics from Strategic Economism: The Development Ethics Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 116(4), pages 735-749, September.
    2. Amernic, Joel & Craig, Russell, 2017. "CEO speeches and safety culture: British Petroleum before the Deepwater Horizon disaster," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 61-80.
    3. Helena Koœcielniak, 2014. "An Improvement Of Information Processes In Enterprises – The Analysis Of Sales Profitability In The Manufacturing Company Using Erp Systems," Polish Journal of Management Studies, Czestochowa Technical University, Department of Management, vol. 10(2), pages 65-72, December.
    4. Martin, Silvia L. & Javalgi, Rajshekhar (Raj) G. & Ciravegna, Luciano, 2018. "Service advantage built on service capabilities: An empirical inquiry of international new ventures," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 371-381.
    5. Calvin Morrill, 2008. "Culture and Organization Theory," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 619(1), pages 15-40, September.
    6. David Weitzner & Yuval Deutsch, 2023. "Harm Reduction, Solidarity, and Social Mobility as Target Functions: A Rortian Approach to Stakeholder Theory," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 186(3), pages 479-492, September.
    7. Valentinov, Vladislav, 2023. "Stakeholder theory: Toward a classical institutional economics perspective," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 188(1), pages 75-88.
    8. Iyer, Karthik N.S. & Srivastava, Prashant & Srinivasan, Mahesh, 2019. "Performance implications of lean in supply chains: Exploring the role of learning orientation and relational resources," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 94-104.
    9. Vilani Sachitra & Siong-Choy Chong, 2017. "Relationships between Institutional Capital, Dynamic Capabilities and Competitive Advantage: Empirical Examination of the Agribusiness Sector," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 7(1), pages 389-397.
    10. Hoeber, Larena & Shaw, Sally, 2017. "Contemporary qualitative research methods in sport management," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 4-7.
    11. Jill Brown & William Forster, 2013. "CSR and Stakeholder Theory: A Tale of Adam Smith," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 112(2), pages 301-312, January.
    12. Richard J. Arend & Moren Lévesque, 2010. "Is the Resource-Based View a Practical Organizational Theory?," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(4), pages 913-930, August.
    13. Miočević, Dario & Talaja, Anita & Alfirević, Nikša, 2021. "Disentangling performance outcomes of a firm’s innovativeness: A resource-advantage perspective," Journal of East European Management Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 26(3), pages 392-414.
    14. Sabrina Spallini & Virginia Milone & Antonio Nisio & Patrizia Romanazzi, 2021. "The Dimension of Sustainability: A Comparative Analysis of Broadness of Information in Italian Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-22, January.
    15. Kornberger, Martin & Carter, Chris & Ross-Smith, Anne, 2010. "Changing gender domination in a Big Four accounting firm: Flexibility, performance and client service in practice," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 35(8), pages 775-791, November.
    16. Marie-José Avenier & Catherine Thomas, 2015. "Finding one's way around various methodological guidelines for doing rigorous case studies: A comparison of four epistemological frameworks [Se frayer un chemin parmi les différentes recommandation," Post-Print halshs-01491454, HAL.
    17. Christian Homburg, 2007. "Betriebswirtschaftslehre als Empirische Wissenschaft — Bestandsaufnahme und Empfehlungen," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 59(56), pages 27-60, January.
    18. Lobo Carla Azevedo & Fernandes Cristina & Ferreira João & Veiga Pedro M. & Gerschewski Stephan, 2023. "The Determinants of International Performance for Family Firms: Understanding the Effects of Resources, Capabilities, and Market Orientation," Entrepreneurship Research Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 13(3), pages 773-811, July.
    19. Omorodion Omoregbe & Eniola Yemi Taiwo, 2017. "Production Facilities Maintenance Practices and Sustainable Competitive Advantage in the Paint Manufacturing Industry, Benin City, Nigeria," Annals of the University of Petrosani, Economics, University of Petrosani, Romania, vol. 17(1), pages 209-222.
    20. Tae Wan Kim & Alan Scheller-Wolf, 2019. "Technological Unemployment, Meaning in Life, Purpose of Business, and the Future of Stakeholders," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 160(2), pages 319-337, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bec:imsber:v:8:y:2016:i:2:p:67-79. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Attaullah Shah (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/imspepk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.