IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bdu/ojjpid/v5y2020i1p36-48id1099.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adoption And Impact Of Improved Pigeon Peas On Farming Household Poverty In Semi-Arid South East Kenya

Author

Listed:
  • S J Matere
  • J R Busienei
  • O.L E Mbatia

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to assess the factors influencing adoption of improved pigeon peas in semi-arid South Eastern Kenya and to evaluate the impact of adoption on households' poverty. Methodology: The study used cross sectional data gathered through household survey to establish the factors influencing improved pigeon pea adoption. Propensity score matching approach was further used to assess the impact of adoption on households' poverty. Findings: The results show that farmers' access to improved pigeon pea seed, contact with agricultural extension service providers and access to market information significantly influenced adoption (p< 0.001). Adopters and non-adopters got an average net farm income of Kenya shillings (KES) 29,570 and 21, 490 per acre per year respectively. Adoption of improved pigeon peas resulted in a decrease of head count poverty by 0.24% and a reduction of poverty gap and poverty severity by 0.30% and 0.20 % respectively. Contribution to theory, practice and policy: The study recommends that both National and County Government make policies that create enabling environment for private sector participation in production of certified seed to improve farmers' access to improved seed to augment production. Facilitating farmers' improved access to reliable and timely market information will increase production of marketable surplus of the peas that are adaptable to semi-arid areas, increase fall income and contribute to reduction of rural poverty.

Suggested Citation

  • S J Matere & J R Busienei & O.L E Mbatia, 2020. "Adoption And Impact Of Improved Pigeon Peas On Farming Household Poverty In Semi-Arid South East Kenya," Journal of Poverty, Investment and Development, IPRJB, vol. 5(1), pages 36-48.
  • Handle: RePEc:bdu:ojjpid:v:5:y:2020:i:1:p:36-48:id:1099
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.iprjb.org/journals/index.php/JPID/article/view/1099/1212
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdu:ojjpid:v:5:y:2020:i:1:p:36-48:id:1099. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: journals@iprjb.org (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.iprjb.org/journals/index.php/JPID/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.