Author
Listed:
- Nicodemas Kasilati Mwaseba
- Begarving Arthur
- Dr. Haji Mussa Mnasi (PhD)
Abstract
Purpose: To ensure accountability, LGAs should have effective and speedy procurement procedures. The rules and regulations in LGAs make it easier for malpractice to happen in public procurement. The effectiveness of legal frameworks on preventing malpractices in public procurement by LGAs is the focus of this paper. Procurement and tendering decisions in organizations are based on Strategic Choice Theory, as discovered in the study. Methodology: Data were collected from employees of the Kasulu district council and suppliers located in Kasulu district. Data were collected from 112 responses to questionnaires and 12 Key Informants Interviewers responded to in-depth interviews. Simple random sampling techniques and purposive sampling techniques were used to select the sample. Data were analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) Version 27; where Multiple Linear Regression analysis and descriptive analysis were conducted to answer the research objectives triangularly with context analysis of the qualitative data. Findings: The study found that application and coverage of Legal and regulatory framework (ACLRF); publishing and advertising rules, and adequate timeframe (PARAT); as well as participatory rules and regulations (PRR) have a significant negative impact on MPP. However, defining procurement methods and circumstances appropriate (DPMCA) had no significant relationship with MPP. The legal and regulatory framework affects malpractices in public procurement in the LGA. It was further found that the more additional units the LGA invests in the effectiveness of the legal framework, the more the prevalence of malpractices in public procurement will be prevented. Unique Contribution to the Theory, Practice and Policy: The study recommends to the LGAs that tendering procedures must be observed and that PPRA policy correspond with organizational goals. The study highlights the importance of maintaining a legal procurement structure in LGA without political interference. Furthermore, the study emphasizes the need to promote legal structure in procurement practice in LGA without any interference from political leaders.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdu:ojijlg:v:3:y:2023:i:3:p:1-16:id:2204. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chief Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iprjb.org/journals/index.php/IJLG/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.