IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bdu/ojijgs/v9y2024i3p54-64id2880.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of Gender Stereotypes on Career Advancement in STEM Fields in Tanzania

Author

Listed:
  • Yasmin Omar

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the study was to analyze the impact of gender stereotypes on career advancement in STEM fields in Tanzania. Methodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries. Findings: In Tanzania, gender stereotypes significantly impede career advancement for women in STEM fields, creating barriers to their professional growth and development. Research reveals that societal expectations and cultural biases often undervalue women’s contributions and limit their opportunities for advancement. Women face challenges such as unequal access to resources, mentorship, and networking opportunities compared to their male counterparts. These stereotypes contribute to lower representation of women in leadership positions within STEM sectors, further perpetuating gender disparities. Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Social role theory, stereotype threat theory & expectancy-value theory may be used to anchor future studies on impact of gender stereotypes on career advancement in STEM fields in Tanzania. Establish mentorship programs that pair LGBTQ+ individuals with supportive mentors who can provide guidance and advocacy. Implement and enforce policies that promote diversity and inclusion in hiring and promotion practices within STEM fields.

Suggested Citation

  • Yasmin Omar, 2024. "Impact of Gender Stereotypes on Career Advancement in STEM Fields in Tanzania," International Journal of Gender Studies, IPRJB, vol. 9(3), pages 54-64.
  • Handle: RePEc:bdu:ojijgs:v:9:y:2024:i:3:p:54-64:id:2880
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iprjb.org/journals/index.php/IJGS/article/view/2880/3368
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdu:ojijgs:v:9:y:2024:i:3:p:54-64:id:2880. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chief Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iprjb.org/journals/index.php/IJGS/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.