IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bdu/ojijgs/v9y2024i3p28-41id2878.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of Gender Representation in Textbooks on Student Achievement in United Kingdom

Author

Listed:
  • Freya Jane

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the study was to analyze the impact of gender representation in textbooks on student achievement in United Kingdom. Methodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries. Findings: The study revealed that balanced gender representation positively influences student outcomes. Research indicates that textbooks featuring diverse gender roles and equitable portrayals help combat gender stereotypes and promote higher engagement and achievement among students. Specifically, when textbooks include a variety of roles and achievements for different genders, students of all genders benefit from improved self-efficacy and academic performance. Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Social learning theory, expectancy-value theory & critical pedagogy theory may be used to anchor future studies on gender representation in textbooks on student achievement in United Kingdom. Educators and curriculum developers should ensure that textbooks and other educational materials represent genders equitably and inclusively. Education policymakers should establish and enforce regulatory standards that mandate gender balance and inclusivity in textbooks.

Suggested Citation

  • Freya Jane, 2024. "Impact of Gender Representation in Textbooks on Student Achievement in United Kingdom," International Journal of Gender Studies, IPRJB, vol. 9(3), pages 28-41.
  • Handle: RePEc:bdu:ojijgs:v:9:y:2024:i:3:p:28-41:id:2878
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iprjb.org/journals/index.php/IJGS/article/view/2878/3366
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdu:ojijgs:v:9:y:2024:i:3:p:28-41:id:2878. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chief Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iprjb.org/journals/index.php/IJGS/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.