IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bdu/ojijgs/v8y2023i2p10-19id1917.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rwanda's Determining Factors for Equality in Women Leadership

Author

Listed:
  • Jeanne Dusabe

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to analyze the determinant of equality practices on women leadership in Rwanda. Methodology: The study adopted a desktop methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low-cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive's time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library. Results: The results revealed that there exist conceptual and contextual gaps relating to the study on equality practices on women leadership in Rwanda Government. Preliminary empirical review reveals that there was a historical conviction that, women are accountable to take care of kids and do household chores than involving themselves in outside home activities like career advancement or furthering in higher education. Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Liberalism theory, alternate approach theory and patriarchy theory may be used to categorize the key work design factors which may relate to equality practices on women leadership in Rwanda. The results of this research will form the basis for further research to investigate into the areas of gender equality strategies in women leadership and evaluation

Suggested Citation

  • Jeanne Dusabe, 2023. "Rwanda's Determining Factors for Equality in Women Leadership," International Journal of Gender Studies, IPRJB, vol. 8(2), pages 10-19.
  • Handle: RePEc:bdu:ojijgs:v:8:y:2023:i:2:p:10-19:id:1917
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iprjb.org/journals/index.php/IJGS/article/view/1917/2028
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdu:ojijgs:v:8:y:2023:i:2:p:10-19:id:1917. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chief Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iprjb.org/journals/index.php/IJGS/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.