IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bdu/ojgjhs/v9y2024i3p55-66id2683.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Association between Healthcare Provider Communication and Patient Adherence to Treatment Plans in Australia

Author

Listed:
  • Ava Jones

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the study was to analyze the association between healthcare provider communication and patient adherence to treatment plans in Australia. Methodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries. Findings: Effective healthcare provider communication in Australia significantly enhances patient adherence to treatment plans. Clear explanations and empathetic engagement from providers positively influence patient compliance. Conversely, poor communication or unclear instructions lead to lower adherence rates. These findings underscore the pivotal role of effective communication in fostering patient adherence and improving healthcare outcomes nationwide. Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Social cognitive theory (SCT), health belief model (HBM) & transactional model of stress and coping (TMSC) may be used to anchor future studies on association between healthcare provider communication and patient adherence to treatment plans in Australia. Implement targeted communication training programs for healthcare providers at all levels. These programs should emphasize skills such as active listening, patient-centered communication, and cultural competence. Advocate for policy initiatives that prioritize communication as a core component of quality healthcare delivery.

Suggested Citation

  • Ava Jones, 2024. "Association between Healthcare Provider Communication and Patient Adherence to Treatment Plans in Australia," Global Journal of Health Sciences, IPRJB, vol. 9(3), pages 55-66.
  • Handle: RePEc:bdu:ojgjhs:v:9:y:2024:i:3:p:55-66:id:2683
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iprjb.org/journals/index.php/GJHS/article/view/2683/3132
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdu:ojgjhs:v:9:y:2024:i:3:p:55-66:id:2683. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chief Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iprjb.org/journals/index.php/GJHS/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.