IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bdu/ojgjhs/v10y2025i1p51-71id3201.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determinants of Traditional Birth Attendants Compliance to Existing Legal Frameworks against Female Genital Mutilation/ Cutting in Garissa County, Kenya

Author

Listed:
  • Sosten Songok
  • Dr. Judy Mugo
  • Dr. Joseph Thigiti

Abstract

Purpose: The study sought to establish the determinants of traditional birth attendants’ compliances to existing legal frameworks against female genital mutilation/ cutting in Garissa County, Kenya. The study intended to answer complex interplay of cultural, religious, and social factors influencing traditional birth attendants' compliance with legal frameworks against FGM/C. Methodology: Study adopted cross sectional study design. Mixed methods approach (Survey and KIIs) was used to collect data. Targeted TBAs, law enforcers and opinion leaders residing in Dadaab Sub- County. Semi-structured questionnaires were used to collect quantitative data while key informant interview guide was used to collect qualitative data. Quantitative data collected was entered into Epidata (version 3.1) database then exported to R (version 3.6.4) for analysis while qualitative data were thematically analysed. 261 participants were recruited, with 86.21% being compliant to existing law against FGM/C. Findings: The independent predictors for compliance to existing legal frameworks against FGM/C in this study were marital status of the active TBAs: married (AOR=7.78, 95% CI=2.4544-24.6443, p<0.001) and widowed (AOR=4.76, 95% CI=1.2063-18.8181, p=0.0259); Education level of the active TBAs: primary education (AOR=5.80, 95% CI=1.3887-24.2616, p=0.016); Required ages for girls/women before circumcision being 5-11 years (AOR=7.91, 95%, CI=2.73-22.95, p<0.001); Mothers accompanying girls/women to circumcision (AOR=7.02, 95% CI=2.0899-23.6125, p=0.0016); Religious background of girls/women to be circumcised (AOR=2.94, 95% CI=1.1688-7.4096, p=0.022); active TBAs who asserted that FGM/C was still deemed necessary in their community (AOR=0.11, 95% CI=0.0146-0.8844, p=0.0378); active TBAs who identified FGM/C Type I as the most predominant in their community (AOR=0.10, 95% CI=0.0261-0.3673, p<0.001); FGM/C being practiced for traditional purposes traditional (AOR=9.86, 95% CI=1.8419-52.7653, p=0.0075); Advocacy through religious approaches on the abandonment of FGM/C (AOR=5.90, 95% CI=2.173-16.0309, p<0.001); active TBAs cognizant of the punishments imposed on perpetrators and accomplices of FGM/C (AOR=3.11, 95% CI=1.279-7.5576, p=0.0123); active TBAs aware of the laws/legislations prohibiting FGM/C in Kenya (AOR=3.06, 95% CI=1.3759-6.7912, p=0.0061); Active TBAs supporting for the education of TBAs on existing anti-FGM/C laws (AOR=4.64, 95% CI=1.7885-12.0514, p=0.0016); active TBAs aware of someone in the community who had reported FGM/C as a crime (AOR=2.71, 95% CI=1.2296-5.9762, p=0.0134). Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Information from the study will influence policy formulation and complement existing literature.

Suggested Citation

  • Sosten Songok & Dr. Judy Mugo & Dr. Joseph Thigiti, 2025. "Determinants of Traditional Birth Attendants Compliance to Existing Legal Frameworks against Female Genital Mutilation/ Cutting in Garissa County, Kenya," Global Journal of Health Sciences, IPRJB, vol. 10(1), pages 51-71.
  • Handle: RePEc:bdu:ojgjhs:v:10:y:2025:i:1:p:51-71:id:3201
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.iprjb.org/journals/index.php/GJHS/article/view/3201/3849
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdu:ojgjhs:v:10:y:2025:i:1:p:51-71:id:3201. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chief Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iprjb.org/journals/index.php/GJHS/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.