IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v9y2025i3sp1073-1081.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparative Analysis of Blended and Traditional Learning Methods in Clinical Physiotherapy: Student Perceptions and Satisfaction

Author

Listed:
  • Ebere Y. Ihegihu

    (Department of Medical Rehabilitation, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Nnewi, Nigeria)

  • Francis G Kasarachi

    (Department of Medical Rehabilitation, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Nnewi, Nigeria)

  • Doluwamu A. Wale-Aina

    (Physiotherapy department, Jericho Nursing Home, Ibadan, Nigeria)

  • Chima C. Ihegihu

    (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Nnewi, Nigeria)

  • Agboola C Akudo

    (Centre for Conflict Management and Peace studies, University of Jos.)

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic led to a global shift in educational practices, including in Nigeria, where school closures prompted a transition to technology-based learning. This study aimed to investigate the perception and satisfaction of clinical physiotherapy students at Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Nnewi Campus, regarding blended learning (BL) compared with traditional face-to-face teaching. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted with 104 clinical physiotherapy students, using the BL Survey and Student Satisfaction Survey Form. Descriptive statistics and Mann–Whitney U tests were used to assess perceptions and satisfaction across different demographics. Results: A positive perception of BL was observed, with 72% of students expressing a preference for this method in the future. However, overall satisfaction was moderate (51.9%), with significant concerns related to technological support, course management, and instructor characteristics. No significant differences in perception were found based on age or sex; however, academic level influenced satisfaction. Conclusions: This study highlights the benefits of BL, such as increased flexibility and resource accessibility, while also noting challenges like technological issues and varying student engagement. Recommendations include improving technological infrastructure and support, refining course management, and conducting further research on long-term impacts.

Suggested Citation

  • Ebere Y. Ihegihu & Francis G Kasarachi & Doluwamu A. Wale-Aina & Chima C. Ihegihu & Agboola C Akudo, 2025. "A Comparative Analysis of Blended and Traditional Learning Methods in Clinical Physiotherapy: Student Perceptions and Satisfaction," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(3s), pages 1073-1081, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:i:3s:p:1073-1081
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-9-issue-3s/1073-1081.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/articles/a-comparative-analysis-of-blended-and-traditional-learning-methods-in-clinical-physiotherapy-student-perceptions-and-satisfaction/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:i:3s:p:1073-1081. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.