IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v9y2025i2p781-794.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Language Learning Strategy Profile of University Learners in the Tanzanian Hybrid Language Learning Context

Author

Listed:
  • Ben Nyongesa Wekesa

    (Department of English, Literature, Journalism & Mass Communication, Kibabii University, Kenya)

Abstract

Language learning, as crucial as it, is related to many factors including sociological, psychological, cognitive psychological, biological and cross-cultural factors Among these factors is the language situation in a country. This study focused on the Hybrid language learning context among Tanzanian university language learners. This study sought to establish the overall strategy profile, the preference among the six strategy categories and the preferences among the individual strategies. Guided by Sociocultural Theory by Vygotsky (1978), a total of 510 respondents randomly sampled from both public and private universities after stratification were involved. Questionnaire based on Oxford (1990) SILL was adopted. Data was statistically analysed using SPSS Version 20. Findings from the study indicated that the language learning strategy use, as measured by the SILL, was moderate (M= 3.4). In terms of the six strategy categories, they were reportedly used in the order of metacognitive, social, cognitive, affective, memory and compensation; with metacognitive strategies used the most frequently (M=3.87) followed by social strategies (M=3.603). The least used strategies (M=2.909) reported were the compensation strategies. The preference for metacognitive strategies can be attributed to the learning culture and the education system examinations oriented and hence learners are expected to be keen on monitoring their progress in language learning and also since learning takes place in poor-input environments, learners try to look for opportunities to practice the language. The argument for the low usage of compensation strategies is due to delayed production or avoidance. They prefer to pay attention when someone is speaking to participating in conversations yet compensation strategies are production strategies. It was also observed that the respondents avoid conversations in English. This is attributed to the low proficiency in English which again goes back to lack of practice opportunities. Regarding individual strategies, the metacognitive strategy of “I pay attention when someone is speaking in English†(No 32) was reported the most frequently used strategy item. On the other hand, the memory strategies of “using flashcards, vocabulary lists to learn new English words†(No 6) was the least reported. The findings indicate that language learners vary widely in their choices and usage of strategies and therefore more research should be conducted on other factors to establish the trend so that language teachers, learners and other stakeholders can be guided appropriately on matters language teaching and learning.

Suggested Citation

  • Ben Nyongesa Wekesa, 2025. "Language Learning Strategy Profile of University Learners in the Tanzanian Hybrid Language Learning Context," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(2), pages 781-794, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:i:2:p:781-794
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-9-Issue:2/781-794.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/articles/language-learning-strategy-profile-of-university-learners-in-the-tanzanian-hybrid-language-learning-context/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:i:2:p:781-794. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.