IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v8y2024i9p990-1000.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Realist vs. Idealist Facilities Managers in Facility Management: A Conceptual Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Irwan Mohammad Ali

    (Department of Built Environment Studies & Technology, College of Built Environment, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Perak Branch, 32610 Seri Iskandar Campus, Perak, Malaysia.)

  • Nurul Diyana Mohd Dahari

    (Jabatan Kerja Raya Negeri Selangor, Kompleks Ibu Pejabat JKR Selangor, Persiaran Jubli Perak, Seksyen 17, 40200 Shah Alam, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia.)

  • Mohd Rahimi A Rahman

    (Ibu Pejabat Jabatan Kerja Raya Malaysia, Jalan Sultan Salahuddin, 50480 Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.)

  • Norashikin Akhiar@Khairuddin

    (Ibu Pejabat Jabatan Kerja Raya Malaysia, Jalan Sultan Salahuddin, 50480 Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.)

Abstract

Facility management (FM) is critical for the efficient operation and long-term sustainability of built environments. Facility managers play a crucial role in fulfilling organisational targets by making strategic decisions that optimise resource use, enhance operational efficiency, and align with broader goals such as environmental responsibility and stakeholder satisfaction. This paper explores the contrasting philosophical beliefs of realism and idealism in FM, highlighting their influence on managerial decision-making, organisational culture, and performance outcomes. A realist facility manager is action-orientated and data-driven, prioritising practicality, cost-effectiveness, and empirical evidence to enhance operational efficiency, optimise resources, and proactively manage risks for measurable outcomes. An idealist facility manager emphasises visionary goals, ethical values, and long-term sustainability, focussing on aligning organisational values with operational practices, fostering stakeholder engagement, and promoting a positive, innovative organisational culture. This paper compares realism and idealism in facility management, examining their principles, assumptions, and approaches. The paper aims to develop a comprehensive framework that integrates the principles of realism and idealism into FM practices. Thus, a conceptual framework is proposed to provide facility managers with actionable insights and strategies that balance the pragmatic, results-driven approach of realism with the visionary, value-orientated perspective of idealism. The proposed methods use a positivist approach with a cross-sectional design, stratified sampling, and structured questionnaires. Next, the data collected is proposed to be analysed using SPSS and SmartPLS, ensuring ethical standards. This methodology serves as a framework for future research to explore how philosophical beliefs influence FM practices. This paper concludes that realism and idealism offer distinct yet complementary beliefs in facility management. It provides a foundation for future empirical research to validate these concepts and their impact on organisational strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Irwan Mohammad Ali & Nurul Diyana Mohd Dahari & Mohd Rahimi A Rahman & Norashikin Akhiar@Khairuddin, 2024. "Realist vs. Idealist Facilities Managers in Facility Management: A Conceptual Framework," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(9), pages 990-1000, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:8:y:2024:i:9:p:990-1000
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-8-issue-9/990-1000.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/articles/realist-vs-idealist-facilities-managers-in-facility-management-a-conceptual-framework/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michiel van Rijn & Jörg Raab & Femke Roosma & Peter Achterberg, 2024. "To Prove and Improve: An Empirical Study on Why Social Entrepreneurs Measure Their Social Impact," Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(2), pages 494-516, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:8:y:2024:i:9:p:990-1000. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.