Author
Listed:
- Lydiah K. Ngwiri
(Department of Educational Communication and Technology, Kenyatta University-Nairobi, Kenya.)
- Florence K. Nyamu
(Department of Educational Communication and Technology, Kenyatta University-Nairobi, Kenya.)
- Moses G. Kariuki
(Department of Educational Communication and Technology, Kenyatta University-Nairobi, Kenya.)
Abstract
Cooperative instructional method is heuristic and mainly learner-centred involving student team learning while Conventional instructional method is expository and teacher-centred. The objective of the study was to investigate the difference in Geometry performance between students taught using the Cooperative instructional method and those taught using the Conventional instructional method. A quasi-experimental design was used. The target population was students and teachers from secondary schools in Meru County, Kenya. Purposive sampling was used to arrive at a sample of six (6) secondary schools, two (2) for boys only, two (2) for girls only, and two (2) co-educational schools. The sampled schools were grouped into two, a control group and an experimental group. The data collection instruments were pre- and post- Geometry Achievement Tests (GAT). To ensure validity of the instruments senior examiners and Mathematics educators in the County reviewed the pre- and post-tests. Quantitative data was analysed using Version 27 of the Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) thereby generating graphs, analysis Tables and frequency charts for inferential and descriptive statistical analysis. The results showed that there is a difference in Geometry performance between students taught using the Cooperative instructional method and those taught using the Conventional instructional method. The hypothesis was examined with a significance level set at α = .05. The mean score for the control group was 26.27 and a standard deviation of 10.926 which differed significantly from those in the experimental group, which had a mean score of 74.02 and a standard deviation of 12.495. The results indicated a significant statistical difference (t (195) = -28.493, p
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:8:y:2024:i:7:p:2951-2959. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.