IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v8y2024i7p2514-2524.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the Listed Property Companies Readiness Towards Environmental Social Governance Implementation in Malaysia

Author

Listed:
  • Vincent Leow Chee Ho

    (Department of Real Estate, Faculty of Built Environment and Surveying, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Skudai, Johor, Malaysia)

  • Lim Jian Yi

    (Department of Real Estate, Faculty of Built Environment and Surveying, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Skudai, Johor, Malaysia)

  • Noorsidi Aizuddin Bin Mat Noor

    (Department of Real Estate, Faculty of Built Environment and Surveying, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Skudai, Johor, Malaysia)

  • Rohaya Binti Abdul Jalil

    (Department of Real Estate, Faculty of Built Environment and Surveying, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Skudai, Johor, Malaysi)

Abstract

The increasingly growing concerns towards sustainable development and corporate social responsibility on a global scale have prompted the implementation of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) principles in the operations of various industries, including the property sector in Malaysia. Therefore, this research aims to assess the readiness of Malaysian-listed property companies to implement ESG practices and investigate the expectations of non-ESG-listed property companies in Malaysia regarding ESG implementation. A comprehensive analysis of survey responses adopts a stratified sampling method with 53 respondents, representing samples from the population of Malaysian listed property companies. The first objective focuses on identifying the readiness among the listed property companies in Malaysia towards ESG implementation. For this objective, data is collected using a structured questionnaire and statistically analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) to calculate descriptive statistics such as mean, standard deviation, and frequency. Additionally, mean analysis is performed to determine the average scores for each dimension. The results are then compared between the environmental, social, and governance factors. The findings reveal that most of the factors in this research have low mean scores, indicating that these factors are considered the least influential, suggesting that Malaysian listed property companies still need to be ready for ESG implementation. The second objective is to investigate the expectations of non-ESG-listed property companies in Malaysia to participate in ESG implementation. Data analysis for this objective primarily involves descriptive statistics through frequency analysis. Furthermore, the Relative Importance Index (RII)assesses the relative importance of expectations for implementing ESG practices. Respondents rate the importance of various factors that impact ESG implementation, and RII scores are calculated to determine the most important expectations. The analysis results show that implementing ESG practices can improve employee morale and productivity, leading to higher top-line growth, the main expectation of Malaysian non-ESG listed property companies regarding ESG implementation. The significance of this quantitative research extends to policymakers, regulators, industry associations, and professional bodies in developing targeted strategies to promote sustainable and ethical behaviours in the Malaysian real estate industry. By quantifying ESG readiness, the research promotes responsible and sustainable business practices among listed property companies, fostering a more resilient and sustainable real estate sector in Malaysia. The findings contribute valuable empirical evidence to ESG implementation within the Malaysian real estate industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Vincent Leow Chee Ho & Lim Jian Yi & Noorsidi Aizuddin Bin Mat Noor & Rohaya Binti Abdul Jalil, 2024. "Assessing the Listed Property Companies Readiness Towards Environmental Social Governance Implementation in Malaysia," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(7), pages 2514-2524, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:8:y:2024:i:7:p:2514-2524
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-8-issue-7/2514-2524.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/articles/assessing-the-listed-property-companies-readiness-towards-environmental-social-governance-implementation-in-malaysia/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eduard Gabriel Ceptureanu & Sebastian Ion Ceptureanu & Doina I. Popescu & Liviu Bogdan Vlad, 2017. "Two Stage Analysis of Successful Change Implementation of Knowledge Management Strategies in Energy Companies from Romania," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-17, November.
    2. Alice Martini, 2021. "Socially responsible investing: from the ethical origins to the sustainable development framework of the European Union," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(11), pages 16874-16890, November.
    3. Haniffa, R.M. & Cooke, T.E., 2005. "The impact of culture and governance on corporate social reporting," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(5), pages 391-430.
    4. Waqas Nawaz & Muammer Koç, 2019. "Exploring Organizational Sustainability: Themes, Functional Areas, and Best Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-36, August.
    5. Badri Ahmadi, Hadi & Kusi-Sarpong, Simonov & Rezaei, Jafar, 2017. "Assessing the social sustainability of supply chains using Best Worst Method," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 99-106.
    6. Luluk Widyawati, 2020. "A systematic literature review of socially responsible investment and environmental social governance metrics," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 619-637, February.
    7. Alaa Aldowaish & Jiro Kokuryo & Othman Almazyad & Hoe Chin Goi, 2022. "Environmental, Social, and Governance Integration into the Business Model: Literature Review and Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-20, March.
    8. Robert G. Eccles & Ioannis Ioannou & George Serafeim, 2014. "The Impact of Corporate Sustainability on Organizational Processes and Performance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(11), pages 2835-2857, November.
    9. Dan Daugaard, 2020. "Emerging new themes in environmental, social and governance investing: a systematic literature review," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 60(2), pages 1501-1530, June.
    10. Samuel Drempetic & Christian Klein & Bernhard Zwergel, 2020. "The Influence of Firm Size on the ESG Score: Corporate Sustainability Ratings Under Review," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 167(2), pages 333-360, November.
    11. Magdalena Ziolo & Beata Zofia Filipiak & Iwona Bąk & Katarzyna Cheba, 2019. "How to Design More Sustainable Financial Systems: The Roles of Environmental, Social, and Governance Factors in the Decision-Making Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-34, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ting-Ting Li & Kai Wang & Toshiyuki Sueyoshi & Derek D. Wang, 2021. "ESG: Research Progress and Future Prospects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-28, October.
    2. Victoria Pistikou & Floros Flouros & Georgios A. Deirmentzoglou & Konstantina K. Agoraki, 2023. "Sustainability Reporting: Examining the Community Impact of the S&P500 Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-25, September.
    3. Caterina Lucarelli & Sabrina Severini, 2024. "Anatomy of the chimera: Environmental, Social, and Governance ratings beyond the myth," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(5), pages 4198-4217, July.
    4. Marzhan Beisenbina & Laura Fabregat‐Aibar & Maria‐Glòria Barberà‐Mariné & Maria‐Teresa Sorrosal‐Forradellas, 2023. "The burgeoning field of sustainable investment: Past, present and future," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(2), pages 649-667, April.
    5. Cheng Guping & Muhammad Safdar Sial & Peng Wan & Alina Badulescu & Daniel Badulescu & Talles Vianna Brugni, 2020. "Do Board Gender Diversity and Non-Executive Directors Affect CSR Reporting? Insight from Agency Theory Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-25, October.
    6. Francesca Gennari, 2019. "How to Lead the Board of Directors to a Sustainable Development of Business with the CSR Committees," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-17, December.
    7. Xiaoyu Cui & Baolei Qi & Muhammad Jameel Hussain, 2024. "Vendor sustainability performance and corporate customers' supplier selection," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(4), pages 2910-2928, July.
    8. Wenbing Luo & Ziyan Tian & Shihu Zhong & Qinke Lyu & Mingjun Deng, 2022. "Global Evolution of Research on Sustainable Finance from 2000 to 2021: A Bibliometric Analysis on WoS Database," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-23, August.
    9. Alan Kai Ming Au & Yi-Fan Yang & Huan Wang & Rui-Hong Chen & Leven J. Zheng, 2023. "Mapping the Landscape of ESG Strategies: A Bibliometric Review and Recommendations for Future Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-26, December.
    10. Felipe Arias Fogliano de Souza Cunha & Erick Meira & Renato J. Orsato, 2021. "Sustainable finance and investment: Review and research agenda," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(8), pages 3821-3838, December.
    11. Dewan Muktadir‐Al‐Mukit & Firoz Haroon Bhaiyat, 2024. "Impact of corporate governance diversity on carbon emission under environmental policy via the mandatory nonfinancial reporting regulation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 1397-1417, February.
    12. Sylvain Marsat & Guillaume Pijourlet & Muhammad Ullah, 2021. "Is there a trade‐off between environmental performance and financial resilience? International evidence from the subprime crisis," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(3), pages 4061-4084, September.
    13. Garanina, Tatiana & Kim, Oksana, 2023. "The relationship between CSR disclosure and accounting conservatism: The role of state ownership," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    14. Zhang, Yanan & Zhang, Xiaoyu, 2024. "Top management team functional diversity and ESG performance," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    15. Sumaia Ayesh Qaderi & Belal Ali Abdulraheem Ghaleb & Abdulwahid Ahmed Hashed & Sitraselvi Chandren & Zaimah Abdullah, 2022. "Board Characteristics and Integrated Reporting Strategy: Does Sustainability Committee Matter?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-24, May.
    16. Jian Zhou & Xiaodong Lei & Jianglong Yu, 2024. "ESG rating divergence and corporate green innovation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 2911-2930, May.
    17. Abdulaziz Mohammed Alsahlawi & Kaouther Chebbi & Mohammed Abdullah Ammer, 2021. "The Impact of Environmental Sustainability Disclosure on Stock Return of Saudi Listed Firms: The Moderating Role of Financial Constraints," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-17, January.
    18. Damberg, Sarah V. & Hartmann, Julia & Heese, H. Sebastian, 2022. "Does bad press help or hinder sustainable supply chain management? An empirical investigation of US-based corporations," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    19. Amir Gholami & Peter A. Murray & John Sands, 2022. "Environmental, Social, Governance & Financial Performance Disclosure for Large Firms: Is This Different for SME Firms?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-21, May.
    20. Ga-Rog Han & Jae-Eun Lee, 2024. "The Moderating Effect of ESG Level in the Relationship between Digital Transformation Capability and Financial Performance: Evidence from Foreign Subsidiaries of Korean Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-15, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:8:y:2024:i:7:p:2514-2524. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.