IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v8y2024i3sp4113-4120.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Satisfaction and Difficulty among Students in Using Google Classroom

Author

Listed:
  • Jo Ann T. Gerada

    (Guimaras State University)

  • Violeta C. Efondo

    (Guimaras State University)

Abstract

This study examines Guimaras State College students’ satisfaction and difficulties in using Google Classroom, a major part of Google Apps for Education (GAFE). The university’s adoption of Google Classroom during the COVID-19 pandemic prompted this investigation. Employing a descriptive research design and stratified sampling, a questionnaire was used for data collection, and SPSS software was used for analysis, including frequency counts, mean values, and correlation assessments. Students express substantial satisfaction, with an overall mean satisfaction score of 3.87, signifying a “High†level of satisfaction. This implies the effectiveness of Google Classroom as a valuable tool for facilitating student education. However, students encounter significant difficulty, leading to a mean difficulty score of 3.60. Despite these difficulties, Google Classroom is generally considered moderately challenging, implying that although the platform is easily available, it depends on sufficient resources like internet connection speed, to run the best. No significant differences were observed in satisfaction levels according to sex or year, but the chosen courses significantly influenced satisfaction levels. This implies that the degree of Google Classroom integration in course delivery explains the variations in satisfaction levels. Sex does not affect student difficulty levels, whereas year level and course of study play substantial roles. Year-level differences imply varying challenges, and course-related distinctions reveal diverse experiences and the extent to which instructors use digital tools in their teaching methodologies. A weak positive correlation exists between student satisfaction and difficulty in using Google Classroom. This finding implies that although greater satisfaction might slightly reduce difficulty, the effect is minimal and differs among students. Zhang and Zhu (2017) portrayal of Google Classroom aligns with these findings, emphasizing its versatility for online learning. To enhance education, institutions should address practical challenges while considering students’ chosen courses. Despite the weak correlation between satisfaction and difficulty, these challenges must be addressed to improve overall educational experiences.

Suggested Citation

  • Jo Ann T. Gerada & Violeta C. Efondo, 2024. "Satisfaction and Difficulty among Students in Using Google Classroom," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(3s), pages 4113-4120, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:8:y:2024:i:3s:p:4113-4120
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-8-issue-3s/4113-4120.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/articles/satisfaction-and-difficulty-among-students-in-using-google-classroom/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:8:y:2024:i:3s:p:4113-4120. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.