Author
Listed:
- Mukhsinin
(Master of Law, Diponegoro University)
- Eko Soponyono
(Master of Law, Diponegoro University)
Abstract
The conditional death penalty in Indonesia is imposed using the principle of balance as a limit of tolerance and legitimacy which originates from the Pancasila Ideology, the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, Human Rights and Human Obligations as well as general legal principles recognized by civilized nations. For this reason, it is necessary to carry out more in-depth research regarding the conditional death penalty from the perspective of criminal law and human rights. The research method used is a normative legal method, namely in the form of library research using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The aim of the research is to find out how the concept of conditional death penalty is in view of criminal law and human rights. The results of this research are that the conditional death penalty which will later apply in Indonesia with the existence of the Criminal Code has taken a middle path or what is called the Indonesian way between retentionist and abolitionist groups which is very appropriate. Philosophical and sociological interpretation, especially of article 28 A and article 28 J of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, where these two articles are certainly not intended to protect perpetrators of criminal acts that have endangered and reduced the right to life of other people, society and other individuals who are victims the criminal act. The conclusion is that the conditional death penalty which has very strict procedures for imposing it is regulated in the criminal law (KUHP) does not conflict with human rights because it only exists de jure and does not exist de facto.
Suggested Citation
Mukhsinin & Eko Soponyono, 2024.
"Death Criminal Policy is Conditional from the Perspective of Criminal Law and Human Rights,"
International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(3s), pages 2247-2253, March.
Handle:
RePEc:bcp:journl:v:8:y:2024:i:3s:p:2247-2253
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:8:y:2024:i:3s:p:2247-2253. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.