IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v8y2024i12p3102-3112.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Audit Quality through KAMs: A Pathway to More Conservative and Reliable Financial Reporting

Author

Listed:
  • Linda Azlinda Sahlan

    (Universiti Sains Malaysia Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman)

  • Phua Lian Kee

    (Universiti Sains Malaysia)

  • Lok Char Lee

    (Universiti Sains Malaysia)

Abstract

This paper studies the association between accounting conservatism as a proxy of reliable and credible financial reporting with the audit quality in Malaysia during COVID-19 pandemic. We explore the effect of audit quality, captured as Key Audit Matters (KAMs), on accounting conservatism by using the C-Score as a proxy, and a sample of 736 listed companies on Bursa Malaysia. We find that audit assurance is positively associated with accounting conservatism, although at a negligible margin of statistical significance. We also find that firm size and profitability are significant determinants of accounting conservatism, while industry classification and leverage have no effect. We find that the relationship between audit assurance and accounting conservatism is complex, and future studies should use multiple measures of audit quality to uncover the effects of audit quality on financial reporting. This study contributes to the continuing debate on the effect of audit assurance in enhancing high quality financial reporting, in a period of uncertainty and crisis.

Suggested Citation

  • Linda Azlinda Sahlan & Phua Lian Kee & Lok Char Lee, 2024. "Audit Quality through KAMs: A Pathway to More Conservative and Reliable Financial Reporting," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(12), pages 3102-3112, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:8:y:2024:i:12:p:3102-3112
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-8-issue-12/3102-3112.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/articles/audit-quality-through-kams-a-pathway-to-more-conservative-and-reliable-financial-reporting/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anwer S. Ahmed & Scott Duellman, 2013. "Managerial Overconfidence and Accounting Conservatism," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(1), pages 1-30, March.
    2. Michael Kend & Lan Anh Nguyen, 2022. "Key audit risks and audit procedures during the initial year of the COVID-19 pandemic: an analysis of audit reports 2019-2020," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 37(7), pages 798-818, January.
    3. Mahmoud Elmarzouky & Khaled Hussainey & Tarek Abdelfattah & Atm Enayet Karim, 2022. "Corporate risk disclosure and key audit matters: the egocentric theory," International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 30(2), pages 230-251, March.
    4. Ma, Jin & Coram, Paul & Troshani, Indrit, 2024. "The effect of key audit matters and management disclosures on auditors’ judgements and decisions: An exploratory study," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(2).
    5. Md Khokan Bepari & Shamsun Nahar & Abu Taher Mollik & Mohammad Istiaq Azim, 2023. "Content characteristics of key audit matters reported by auditors in Bangladesh and their implications for audit quality," Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 14(4), pages 855-885, September.
    6. Joseph P. H. Fan & T. J. Wong & Tianyu Zhang, 2013. "Institutions and Organizational Structure: The Case of State-Owned Corporate Pyramids," The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 29(6), pages 1217-1252, December.
    7. Moy, Melissa & Heaney, Richard & Tarca, Ann & van Zyl, Warrick, 2020. "Conditional accounting conservatism: Exploring the impact of changes in institutional frameworks in four countries," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(3).
    8. Camelia-Daniela Hategan & Ruxandra-Ioana Pitorac & Andreea Claudia Crucean, 2022. "Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on auditors’ responsibility: evidence from European listed companies on key audit matters," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 37(7), pages 886-907, April.
    9. Khan, Mozaffar & Watts, Ross L., 2009. "Estimation and empirical properties of a firm-year measure of accounting conservatism," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(2-3), pages 132-150, December.
    10. Qi Chen & Thomas Hemmer & Yun Zhang, 2007. "On the Relation between Conservatism in Accounting Standards and Incentives for Earnings Management," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(3), pages 541-565, June.
    11. Md Khokan Bepari & Abu Taher Mollik & Shamsun Nahar & Mohammad Nazrul Islam, 2022. "Determinants of Accounts Level and Entity Level Key Audit Matters: Further Evidence," Accounting in Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(3), pages 397-422, September.
    12. Shuling Chiang & Gary Kleinman & Picheng Lee, 2023. "The effect of key audit matters on the association of credit risk and earnings quality," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 38(7), pages 997-1023, July.
    13. Yan Luo, 2021. "Determinants and consequence of critical audit matter disclosure: early evidence," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 18(4), pages 336-345, December.
    14. Chang-yeol In & Taeheung Kim & Sambock Park, 2020. "Key Audit Matters for Production-To-Order Industry and Conservatism," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-19, January.
    15. Saeed Rabea Baatwah, 2022. "Key audit matters and big4 auditors in Oman: a quantile approach analysis," Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 21(5), pages 1124-1148, February.
    16. Chao-Wei Li & Ya-Yi Chao, 2020. "The effect of auditing assurance levels on accounting conservatism: evidence from Taiwan," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 11(1), pages 64-76, February.
    17. Hui Liu & Jiaqi Ning & Yue Zhang & Junrui Zhang, 2022. "Key audit matters and debt contracting: evidence from China," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 37(6), pages 657-678, June.
    18. Kosmidou, Kyriaki & Kousenidis, Dimitrios & Ladas, Anestis & Negkakis, Christos, 2020. "Regulation of capital flows: Effects on liquidity and the role of financial reporting quality," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 86-97.
    19. Antti Rautiainen & Jani Saastamoinen & Kati Pajunen, 2021. "Do key audit matters (KAMs) matter? Auditors’ perceptions of KAMs and audit quality in Finland," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 36(3), pages 386-404, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Taewoo Kim, 2021. "Does a Manager Respond to a Going-Concern Audit Opinion with an Asymmetry in Gain and Loss?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-18, April.
    2. Ha, Joohyung & Feng, Mingming, 2018. "Conditional conservatism and labor investment efficiency," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 14(2), pages 143-163.
    3. María‐del‐Mar Camacho‐Miñano & Domenico Campa & Laura Parte, 2024. "Earnings management reactions to key audit matters," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 15(S7), pages 115-130, November.
    4. Byzalov, Dmitri & Basu, Sudipta, 2024. "The misuse of regression-based x-Scores as dependent variables," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(2).
    5. Krishnan, Gopal V. & Zhang, Jing, 2022. "Principles-based standards and conditional accounting conservatism," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    6. Gerald J. Lobo & Ashok Robin & Kean Wu, 2020. "Share repurchases and accounting conservatism," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 54(2), pages 699-733, February.
    7. Chen, Yunyan & Wu, Shinong & Zhou, Yucheng & Huo, Di, 2023. "Gambling culture and corporate violations: Evidence from China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    8. Dan Zhang & Shiguang Ma & Xiaofei Pan, 2023. "How do institutional investors influence accounting conservatism in China?," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(S2), pages 2719-2754, June.
    9. Luc Paugam & Olivier Ramond, 2015. "Effect of Impairment-Testing Disclosures on the Cost of Equity Capital," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(5-6), pages 583-618, June.
    10. Maha Khalifa & Hakim Ben Othman, 2015. "The effect of conservatism on cost of capital: MENA evidence," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(1), pages 71-87, January.
    11. Fu, Zheng & Ma, Yechi & Li, Suyang & Qiao, Lu, 2023. "Peer performance and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings recognition," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    12. C. S. Agnes Cheng & Xiaohui (Fiona) Li & Jing Xie & Yuxiang Zhong, 2023. "Accounting conservatism and common ownership by dedicated institutional blockholders," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(9-10), pages 1943-1983, October.
    13. Araceli Mora & Martin Walker, 2015. "The implications of research on accounting conservatism for accounting standard setting," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(5), pages 620-650, August.
    14. Raghavan J. Iyengar & Ernest M. Zampelli, 2010. "Does accounting conservatism pay?," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 50(1), pages 121-142, March.
    15. Umair Bhutta & Jéssica Nunes Martins & Mário Nuno Mata & Ali Raza & Rui Miguel Dantas & Anabela Batista Correia & Muhammad Rafiq, 2021. "Intellectual Structure and Evolution of Accounting Conservatism Research: Past Trends and Future Research Suggestions," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-13, June.
    16. Lu Qiao & Emmanuel Adegbite & Tam Huy Nguyen, 2024. "CFO overconfidence and conditional accounting conservatism," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 62(1), pages 1-37, January.
    17. Ding, Rong & Jacoby, Gady & Liu, Mingzhi & Wang, Tingting & Wu, Zhenyu, 2024. "Does climate risk shape firms’ accounting conservatism?," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    18. Ding, Hui & Liu, Chenguang & Ni, Xiaoran, 2023. "Creditor protection and labor investment efficiency: Evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 58(PD).
    19. James A. Chyz & Fabio B. Gaertner & Asad Kausar & Luke Watson, 2019. "Overconfidence and Corporate Tax Policy," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 1114-1145, September.
    20. Zhang, Xinyue & Zhong, Yuxiang & Li, Wanli, 2022. "The effect of borrowers' accounting conservatism on lenders' loan loss provisions: Evidence from China's banking industry," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:8:y:2024:i:12:p:3102-3112. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.