IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v8y2024i12p1386-1398.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Advancing Workforce Sustainability: Policy Reforms for Flexible Working Arrangements in Achieving National SDGs

Author

Listed:
  • Sharifah Rahama Amirul

    (Faculty of Business, Economic and Accountancy, University Malaysia Sabah)

  • Sharija Che Shaari

    (Faculty of Business, Economic and Accountancy, University Malaysia Sabah)

  • Stephen Jones

    (School of Business, University of Queensland, Australia)

Abstract

Workforce sustainability is a cornerstone of economic growth and societal well-being. One game-changing policy instrument for increasing workplace diversity, inclusion, and adaptation is the rise of flexible working `arrangements (FWAs) in Malaysia. As Malaysia strives to align with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly those focusing on economic growth, gender equality, and well-being. This paper critically analyses four main areas related to FWAs in Malaysia. First, it discusses the rationale of FWAs in supporting the three main SDG goals, which are to improve good health and well-being, gender equality, decent work and economic growth. Second, the paper reviews the contemporary FWA policy in Malaysia. Thirdly, the paper discusses the development of FWA’s Regulations in Malaysia. Based on these three main critical reviews, we argue that a greater emphasis should be placed on advancing Workforce Sustainability by reforming FWAs policies in achieving National SDGs. We developed an analytical FWAs policy framework that can be used in negotiation or decision-making to lead the development of a more thorough set of policies for managing FWAs. These reforms are crucial for developing a stronger and coherent labour market that can support national and global development goals.

Suggested Citation

  • Sharifah Rahama Amirul & Sharija Che Shaari & Stephen Jones, 2024. "Advancing Workforce Sustainability: Policy Reforms for Flexible Working Arrangements in Achieving National SDGs," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(12), pages 1386-1398, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:8:y:2024:i:12:p:1386-1398
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-8-issue-12/1386-1398.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/articles/advancing-workforce-sustainability-policy-reforms-for-flexible-working-arrangements-in-achieving-national-sdgs/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter Pisár & Ján Huňady & Erika Ľapinová, 2018. "Work Flexibility in Developed Countries: Economic Context and Policy Implications," Prague Economic Papers, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2018(6), pages 684-703.
    2. Craig W. Hutton & Robert J. Nicholls & Attila N. Lázár & Alex Chapman & Marije Schaafsma & Mashfiqus Salehin, 2018. "Potential Trade-Offs between the Sustainable Development Goals in Coastal Bangladesh," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-14, April.
    3. Alpha Kaleb Gill & Danish Siddiqui, 2020. "How Flexible Work Arrangements Affects Affective Organizational Commitment, and Work-Life Enrichment in Pakistan¡¯s Service Industry: The Role of Time Planning, Work-Life Conflict, and Engagement," Human Resource Research, Macrothink Institute, vol. 4(1), pages 269-313, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wuliyasu Bai & Liang Yan & Jingbo Liang & Long Zhang, 2022. "Mapping Knowledge Domain on Economic Growth and Water Sustainability: A Scientometric Analysis," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 36(11), pages 4137-4159, September.
    2. Manuel Sousa & Maria Fatima Almeida & Rodrigo Calili, 2021. "Multiple Criteria Decision Making for the Achievement of the UN Sustainable Development Goals: A Systematic Literature Review and a Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-37, April.
    3. Shin-Cheng Yeh & Haw-Jeng Chiou & Ai-Wei Wu & Ho-Ching Lee & Homer C. Wu, 2019. "Diverged Preferences towards Sustainable Development Goals? A Comparison between Academia and the Communication Industry," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-21, November.
    4. Schaafsma, Marije & Eigenbrod, Felix & Gasparatos, Alexandros & Gross-Camp, Nicole & Hutton, Craig & Nunan, Fiona & Schreckenberg, Kate & Turner, Kerry, 2021. "Trade-off decisions in ecosystem management for poverty alleviation," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    5. Maria Inês Paes Ferreira & Graham Sakaki & Pamela Shaw & Thaís Nacif de Souza Riscado & Luis Felipe Umbelino, 2023. "Sustainable Water Management and the 2030 Agenda: Comparing Rain Forest Watersheds in Canada and Brazil by Applying an Innovative Sustainability Indicator System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-15, October.
    6. Patricia Urban & Markus Hametner, 2022. "The Economy–Environment Nexus: Sustainable Development Goals Interlinkages in Austria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-25, September.
    7. Francisco Guijarro & Juan A. Poyatos, 2018. "Designing a Sustainable Development Goal Index through a Goal Programming Model: The Case of EU-28 Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-17, September.
    8. Bahati Ally Magesa & Geetha Mohan & Indrek Melts & Hirotaka Matsuda & Jian Pu & Kensuke Fukushi, 2023. "Interactions between Farmers’ Adaptation Strategies to Climate Change and Sustainable Development Goals in Tanzania, East Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-14, March.
    9. Ng, Peggy M.L. & Lit, Kam Kong & Cheung, Cherry T.Y., 2022. "Remote work as a new normal? The technology-organization-environment (TOE) context," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:8:y:2024:i:12:p:1386-1398. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.