Author
Listed:
- Ella Vrisca Gino Faniya
(Postgraduate Master Student of Notarial Affairs at Warmadewa University)
- I Nyoman Sujana
(Lecturer of Faculty of Law and Master of Notarial Affairs Postgraduate Program of Warmadewa University)
- dan I Ketut Kasta Arya Wijaya
(Master of Notary Affairs, Postgraduate Program, Warmadewa University, Bali-Indonesia)
Abstract
This research is a normative legal research that examines the legal certainty of marriage agreements regarding immovable property in mixed marriages in the perspective of the Constitutional Court decision number: 69/PUU-XII/2015, the focus of the study in this research is regarding the legal protection of property does not move the parties in mixed marriages in the perspective of the decision of the Constitutional Court number: 69/PUU-XII/2015. This is the focus of research because of the marriage agreement after the Constitutional Court decision number: 69/PUU-XII/2015, which until now there is still no legal uncertainty regarding immovable property in mixed marriages. Related to this juridical phenomenon, the theories that will be used in this study are the theory of legal certainty, the theory of legal protection and the theory of justice, using statutory approaches, interpretation approaches, comparative approaches, and conceptual approaches, after analysis it is found that, in Mixed marriages in order to provide legal protection for the immovable property of the parties, there must be a marriage agreement in the marriage. For a marriage agreement made after the marriage has taken place, it must be determined that the agreement is valid from the time the marriage takes place or a list of assets owned during the marriage takes place, provided that the assets registered in the names of each husband and wife belong to the individual husband and/or wife.
Suggested Citation
Ella Vrisca Gino Faniya & I Nyoman Sujana & dan I Ketut Kasta Arya Wijaya, 2023.
"Legal Certainty of Marriage Agreement Concerning Immovable Property in Mixed Marriages in The Perspective of The Constitutional Court Decision Number: 69/PUU-XII/2015,"
International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 7(7), pages 1417-1426, July.
Handle:
RePEc:bcp:journl:v:7:y:2023:i:7:p:1417-1426
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:7:y:2023:i:7:p:1417-1426. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.