Author
Abstract
This study examined admission policies and quality teaching in universities in Lagos State, Nigeria. Two research hypotheses were formulated and the study adopted descriptive survey and correlational designs. The population of the study comprised of all the 2623 academic staff and all 400 level students from three universities in used, public and private each in Lagos State, Nigeria with a sample size of 1187 using the simple random, multistage, stratify, disproportionate and purposive sampling techniques. Data were collected through the structured rating scale, Admission Policy Scale (APS) and Quality Teaching Questionnaire (QTQ). The instruments were validated through face, content and construct validity and were found reliable at 0.75 and 0.78 coefficient of test-retest method for each item respectively. The data collected were analysed using Pearson’s Product-Moment Correlation Coefficient. The hypotheses formulated were tested at 0.05 level of significance. The test of the first hypotheses showed a non-significant relationship between admission policies and quality teaching in universities in Lagos State, Nigeria(r=.024, p >.05), while the second hypothesis showed a no statistical significant difference in the admission policies(F (2, 584) = .989, p>.05) amongst universities in Lagos State. The study concluded that admission policies may not necessarily guarantee quality teaching in the universities. The study, therefore, recommends, among others that educational planner and policy makers in education that includes: university managements, National Universities Commission, Federal and State Ministry of Education, Joint Admission and Matriculation Board should ensure that admission into universities should be based purely on merit. The quota system of admission which constitutes catchment area and educationally less developed area for instance, which has its root in the federal character policy, negates the principle of equity and should be abolished. Also to improve quality teaching, teaching and non-teaching staff should be motivated with educational grants for further research by government, university management to make them more dedicated, devoted, committed and effective in their jobs.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
References listed on IDEAS
- repec:dgr:rugcds:24 is not listed on IDEAS
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:5:y:2021:i:2:p:401-407. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.