Author
Abstract
The paper sets out to determine the adequacy or otherwise of the definition of Public Private Partnership (PPP) in Nigeria. As a result of paucity of public funds, Nigeria introduced the concept of PPP in its public procurement strategy so as to tackle its glaring infrastructure deficit, which presently, is put at 70% – 75% of GDP. Despite the enthusiasm of stakeholders in this respect, the fundamental challenge is the capacity, within the extant legal framework that used the term ‘concession’, to identify the scope, parameters and limitations of the concept in exploring available options for successful delivery of PPP projects in Nigeria. The significance of correct identification of PPP parameters for the participation of the private sector in the delivery of public infrastructure and services cannot therefore be underestimated considering Nigeria’s aspiration and the role of infrastructure to economic growth and national prosperity. Using a doctrinal research methodology and a purposive sampling technique, the paper reviewed extant definitions of the concept in many PPP national jurisdictions, international organizations and relevant academic writers to conclude that the definition of PPP under section 36 of the Infrastructure Concession Regulatory Commission (ICRC) Act is inadequate. Such a definition is incapable of capacitating public authorities to explore all available PPP options in their effort to achieve Nigeria’s desire for private financing of public infrastructure and services. Out of the five legal parameters identified by this paper for any standard definition of PPP, the definition under section 36 of the ICRC Act met only two parameters. It therefore recommended that the ICRC Act should be amended to be more expansive as to accommodate the different types, classifications and parameters of the PPP definitions propounded in the guidelines of many Multilateral and Development Banks (MDBs).
Suggested Citation
Faruk Sani, 2021.
"The Legal Concept of Public Private Partnership (PPP) and its Limited Scope in Nigeria,"
International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 5(09), pages 825-833, September.
Handle:
RePEc:bcp:journl:v:5:y:2021:i:09:p:825-833
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:5:y:2021:i:09:p:825-833. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.