IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v5y2021i09p618-626.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implications of the African Peer Review Mechanism (APRM) on Good Governance among African Union (AU) Member States (TETFUND SPONSORED)

Author

Listed:
  • Uhumwangho Patrick Nehikhare

    (Department of Political Science, College of Education, Igueben, Nigeria)

  • Osuinde Jacob Osezua

    (Department of Political Science, College of Education, Igueben, Nigeria)

Abstract

This study investigated the implications of the African Peer Review Mechanism (APRM) on democracy and good governance in Africa. It was predicated on the assumption that good governance can be deliberately pursued and consciously nurtured to foster peace, progress and development among African Union (AU) member states. Three research questions were raised to guide the study which relied on both primary and secondary sources of data. A Focus Group Interview Questionnaire was designed. Eleven (11) countries were purposively and randomly selected for the study which fielded twenty four (24) respondents. The findings revealed the following: member states had good understanding of key indices upon which good governance could be identified, measured and/or benchmarked, that there was a prevalence of many democratic structures and institutions in member states with varying degrees of efficiency and effectiveness in performance and that while the present democratic attainment in member states cannot per se be linked to accession to the APRM, tangential benefits from same cannot be denied. Consequently, the study recommended that the formal structures of the APRM should be revised and a realistic time-frame be set for achieving different stages and processes of the review mechanism. Also, access to press freedom, justice and independence of the judiciary should be deeply entrenched as part of the democratic practice and culture of African states. The active participation of civil society and other non-state actors in the review process was also highlighted. A paradigm shift was also suggested to ensure that processes of the APRM actually change perceptions and build consensus around solutions. Lastly, African leaders were advised to compliment their verbal commitments to democracy and good governance with a strong political will to enforce Country Review Reports. The implementation of these recommendations will redirect the APRM process towards actualizing good governance, sustainable development and regional economic integration of African States.

Suggested Citation

  • Uhumwangho Patrick Nehikhare & Osuinde Jacob Osezua, 2021. "Implications of the African Peer Review Mechanism (APRM) on Good Governance among African Union (AU) Member States (TETFUND SPONSORED)," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 5(09), pages 618-626, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:5:y:2021:i:09:p:618-626
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-5-issue-9/618-626.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/virtual-library/papers/implications-of-the-african-peer-review-mechanism-aprm-on-good-governance-among-african-union-au-member-states/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:5:y:2021:i:09:p:618-626. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.