IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v4y2020i8p365-368.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of the Use of the Quick on the Draw Cooperative Learning Model and the Guided Inquiry Learning Type against Student Learning Outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Sulasmi

    (Master of Social Science Education, FKIP Universitas Lampung, Indonesia)

  • Pargito

    (Master of Social Science Education, FKIP Universitas Lampung, Indonesia)

  • Risma Margaretha Sinaga

    (Master of Social Science Education, FKIP Universitas Lampung, Indonesia)

Abstract

This research was aimed at finding out (1) the differences between the students’ achievement that used cooperative learning model of quick on the draw type and the students’ achievement that used guided inquiry learning model, (2) the effect of using cooperative learning model of quick on the draw type on the students’ learning achievement. (3) the effectivities of using cooperative learning model of quick on the draw type on the students’ learning achievement. Quasi experiment was used in this study. The populations were the students at class XI Social 1 and 2. To analyze the data, T-Test and linear regression analysis were used. The results showed that (1) there was a difference between the students’ achievement that used cooperative learning model of quick on the draw type and the students’ achievement that used guided inquiry learning model, (2) there was more than effect of using cooperative learning model of quick on the draw type on the students’ learning achievement.(3) there was an effective of using cooperative learning model of quick on the draw type on the students’ learning achievement with guided inquiry learning.

Suggested Citation

  • Sulasmi & Pargito & Risma Margaretha Sinaga, 2020. "Comparison of the Use of the Quick on the Draw Cooperative Learning Model and the Guided Inquiry Learning Type against Student Learning Outcomes," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 4(8), pages 365-368, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:4:y:2020:i:8:p:365-368
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-4-issue-8/365-368.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/virtual-library/papers/comparison-of-the-use-of-the-quick-on-the-draw-cooperative-learning-model-and-the-guided-inquiry-learning-type-against-student-learning-outcomes/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:4:y:2020:i:8:p:365-368. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.