IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v4y2020i10p69-74.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

E-learning in Tertiary Education in Ghana: Exploring Its Nuggets and Nuances for Stakeholder Engagement

Author

Listed:
  • Davis Mawuena Aweso

    (Agogo Presbyterian Women’s College of Education, Education Department,Ghana)

  • Ephraim Armstrong Awinbugri (Ph.D)

    (University of Education, Winneba-IDeL, Ghana)

  • Nicholas Aning Boadu Nsakwa

    (Agogo Presbyterian Women’s College of Education, Social Studies Department, Ghana)

  • Francis Kwesi Nsakwa

    (Gabriel-Wettey University of Education, Winneba-IDeL-Kasoa Study Centre)

  • Edmond Nyarko-Nkrumah

    (Agogo Presbyterian Women’s College of Education, Mathematics/IT Department, Ghana)

Abstract

Electronic teaching and learning continue to soar across all levels of education in Ghana especially following the emergence of covid-19. To this end, plethora of Colleges and Universities are interested in how to best engage e-learners as regards course content. This study explores the dynamics through which taking courses via e-learning medium utilizes student engagement, juxtaposing data from the Ministry of Education-Ghana. Data was analyzed using a series of ordinary least squares regression models, also controlling for relevant student and institutional traits. The results corroborated several significant correlations between e-learning and final years student engagement in Ghana’s tertiary institutions. Those students taking quite a number of online courses were more likely to engage in quantitative reasoning than their other counterparts. Nonetheless, they were less likely to engage in collaborative learning, student-faculty interactions, and discussions with diverse others, compared to their more traditional classroom counterparts. The students with greater numbers of online courses also indicated less exposure to effective teaching practices and lower quality of interactions. The relationship between these engagement indicators and the percentage of classes taken online suggests that an online environment might benefit certain types of engagement but may also be somewhat of a deterrent to others. Institutions should consider these findings when designing online course content and encourage faculty to contemplate ways of encouraging student engagement across a variety of delivery types. Higher learning institutions should blend e-learning with traditional learning so as to fully expose variety of learners to the merits and somewhat demerits of either modes. More importantly, as majority of students who enjoyed the lofty Free Senior High School policy await admissions in tertiary institutions, the researchers recommend that e-learning batch of students be concurrently admitted with normal classroom delivery students so as to ensure increased intake and further ensure no qualified student is left behind due to infrastructural deficit. With this, whilst students are in school for traditional face-to-face sessions, their counterparts are home for e-learning with this practice being rotated on semester basis until such a time infrastructural deficit are addressed.

Suggested Citation

  • Davis Mawuena Aweso & Ephraim Armstrong Awinbugri (Ph.D) & Nicholas Aning Boadu Nsakwa & Francis Kwesi Nsakwa & Edmond Nyarko-Nkrumah, 2020. "E-learning in Tertiary Education in Ghana: Exploring Its Nuggets and Nuances for Stakeholder Engagement," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 4(10), pages 69-74, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:4:y:2020:i:10:p:69-74
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-4-issue-10/69-74.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/virtual-library/papers/e-learning-in-tertiary-education-in-ghana-exploring-its-nuggets-and-nuances-for-stakeholder-engagement/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:4:y:2020:i:10:p:69-74. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.