IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bco/ncafaa/v4y2020p17-30.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Annual Reports of Banks in Comparative Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Tunga BOZDOÄžAN

    (Ph.D., Associate Professor, EskiÅŸehir Osmangazi University, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Department of Business Administration)

  • Halil ERDOÄžAN

    (Ph.D. Candidate, EskiÅŸehir Osmangazi University, Institute of Social Sciences)

Abstract

Banks are one of the most important units of the economic structure today. From the top public authority to the smallest investor, administrators who are responsible for the economy need information about the bank's financial situation and operational results. This information, required by decision-makers, is given by the annual reports prepared by the bank. The annual reports should be presented in a clear, understandable and comparable way to meet the required information of the relevant decision-makers. The purpose of this study is to analyze the content of bank annual reports from a comparative perspective. In this framework, Introduction, Corporate Governance, Financial Reporting and Activities Analysis and Evaluation of the Annual Reports of JP Morgan Chase Bank, which is the United States' largest bank, and Is bank of Turkey, which is Turkey's largest private sector bank, were compared by total assets by the end of 2019 with this study. The differences between the banks were tried to be determined and the determined differences were evaluated according to their level of importance.

Suggested Citation

  • Tunga BOZDOÄžAN & Halil ERDOÄžAN, 2020. "Evaluation of Annual Reports of Banks in Comparative Perspective," New Challenges in Accounting and Finance, EUROKD, vol. 4, pages 17-30.
    • Handle: RePEc:bco:ncafaa::v:4:y:2020:p:17-30
    DOI: 10.32038/NCAF.2020.04.02
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://api.eurokd.com/Uploads/Article/115/NCAF.2020.04.02.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.32038/NCAF.2020.04.02?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bco:ncafaa::v:4:y:2020:p:17-30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sara Gunen (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.