IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bco/ncafaa/v3y2020p53-68.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Influence of Earnings Quality for Restatements and Auditor’s Qualified Opinion

Author

Listed:
  • Adriano Antonio Siqueira

    (Fucape Business School, Brazil)

  • Fernando Caio Galdi

    (Fucape Business School, Brazil)

Abstract

The objective of the present study was to raise the cases of restatements and to evaluate whether these events were associated with the low earnings quality and with the provision of advice with a qualified opinion by audit firms. The results obtained with the analysis indicate that the low earnings quality increases the chances of republishing the financial statements. Additionally, the results indicate that there is no evidence that lower earnings quality increases the chances of issuing a qualified audit report or disapproval of the financial statements by the independent auditors. These results point to a divergence regarding the understanding of earnings quality by the auditors and by the regulatory agency.

Suggested Citation

  • Adriano Antonio Siqueira & Fernando Caio Galdi, 2020. "The Influence of Earnings Quality for Restatements and Auditor’s Qualified Opinion," New Challenges in Accounting and Finance, EUROKD, vol. 3, pages 53-68.
    • Handle: RePEc:bco:ncafaa::v:3:y:2020:p:53-68
    DOI: 10.32038/NCAF.2020.03.05
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://api.eurokd.com/Uploads/Article/108/NCAF.2020.03.05.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.32038/NCAF.2020.03.05?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bco:ncafaa::v:3:y:2020:p:53-68. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sara Gunen (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.