IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bco/ncafaa/v3y2020p14-28.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis Good Governance of Corruption Eradication toward Penta Helix Model in Indonesia

Author

Listed:
  • Aris Sarjito

    (Indonesian Defense University)

  • Ghazalie

    (Indonesian Defense University)

Abstract

Transparency International released an annual report on the corruption perception index in 2018. The survey results of 180 countries showed a bad score because more than two-thirds scored less than 50. The highest score is 100, which means very clean or free of corruption, and the lowest is zero which means it is very corrupt. Indonesia must learn from New Zealand and Australia who have succeeded in helping improve the corruption perception index in their country, even though Indonesia's corruption perception index experienced an upward trend in 2014-2018. In an effort to analyze Good Governance in eradicating corruption in Indonesia, the researchers applied the Penta Helix Model, better known as the ABCGM concept, namely Academicians, Business, Community, Government, and Media to reduce the level of corruption in Indonesia. This research method is qualitative to investigate, find, describe, and explain the quality or features of social influences that cannot be explained, measured or described through a quantitative approach. The Penta Helix model is considered to have a positive influence in eradicating corruption.

Suggested Citation

  • Aris Sarjito & Ghazalie, 2020. "Analysis Good Governance of Corruption Eradication toward Penta Helix Model in Indonesia," New Challenges in Accounting and Finance, EUROKD, vol. 3, pages 14-28.
    • Handle: RePEc:bco:ncafaa::v:3:y:2020:p:14-28
    DOI: 10.32038/NCAF.2020.03.02
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://api.eurokd.com/Uploads/Article/111/NCAF.2020.03.02.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.32038/NCAF.2020.03.02?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bco:ncafaa::v:3:y:2020:p:14-28. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sara Gunen (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.