IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bbs/prospe/v4y2017i4p6-28.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How I developed vocabulary tests using corpus-based word lists?

Author

Listed:
  • Simon Krisztián

Abstract

Vocabulary development is central to language mastery. one of the first issues that learners face is what size their vocabulary should be. There are varying theoretical and practical approaches to this issue, regarding the required size and depth connection in corpus research. Webb (2008) argues that 2,000-5,000 words families are enough to understand texts. To address the possible highest text coverage a number of corpora have been developed. From these Browne, Culligan and Phillips’ (2013) New General Service List together with Coxhead’s Academic Word List (2000) were selected for classroom implementation and later complemented by items from nation and Beglar’s (2007) Vocabulary size test. The context of the project was a Listening and Speaking Skills course the Department of English studies at the University of Pécs. Following a blended approach, vocabulary instruction took place online through the online flashcard platform Quizlet. Students were presented with two sets of flashcards weekly; one covering the items from the above corpora lists and a second with key words from the listening tasks. Additionally, students were required to prepare flashcard decks based on their presentations. To measure vocabulary development nation and Beglar’s (2007) Vocabulary size test was put to use as a pre and post-test at the start and end of the semester respectively. students also completed three online vocabulary tests on Edmodo and a final paper and pencil test involving words from the whole course in the format of Wesche & Paribakht’s (1996) Vocabulary Knowledge scale. Overall, the project was successful, as the post-test determined there was an average increase of almost 700 after four months.

Suggested Citation

  • Simon Krisztián, 2017. "How I developed vocabulary tests using corpus-based word lists?," Prosperitas, Budapest Business University, vol. 4(4), pages 6-28.
  • Handle: RePEc:bbs:prospe:v:4:y:2017:i:4:p:6-28
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://publikaciotar.uni-bge.hu/id/eprint/1099/1/06_28_oldal.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bbs:prospe:v:4:y:2017:i:4:p:6-28. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Zsolt Kovács (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/bgfbuhu.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.