IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bbs/prospe/v3y2016i1p33-56.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Betegek terápiás preferenciáinak feltárása és ellátásának javítása conjoint analízissel és költség-haszon elemzéssel

Author

Listed:
  • Koppány Krisztián

Abstract

The purpose of the Medic Sphere research project conducted by the Budapest Business School Zalaegerszeg College of Business Administration was to implement decision-making models based on healtheconomics principles in order to explore better outputs and results and to identify the prevention of unfavourable trends and poorer outcomes. Primarily, we tried to rely on the method of the cost-benefit analysis which expresses both the costs and the gains in cash value. The goal of the cost-benefit analysis research group was to, accordingly, find or implement a method which enables the measuring and monetary/financial capturing of benefits as perceived by patients generated by the different features of health products and services. This study presents such a version of conjoint analysis and its theoretical application that – unlike the analyses in the field that define the commonly used rankings and scores–applies patients’ reservation prices for ranking preferences. The results can be beneficial for supporting the evaluation of different therapy alternatives starting from the current treatment of the patient, considering changes in costs and benefits of the patient and applying the decision map which is a widespread tool in health-economics.

Suggested Citation

  • Koppány Krisztián, 2016. "Betegek terápiás preferenciáinak feltárása és ellátásának javítása conjoint analízissel és költség-haszon elemzéssel," Prosperitas, Budapest Business University, vol. 3(1), pages 33-56.
  • Handle: RePEc:bbs:prospe:v:3:y:2016:i:1:p:33-56
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://publikaciotar.uni-bge.hu/id/eprint/1077/1/Koppany-K..pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bbs:prospe:v:3:y:2016:i:1:p:33-56. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Zsolt Kovács (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/bgfbuhu.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.